SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




COMMENTARY
Chicken in the Basket
By AUNG ZAW Wednesday, October 7, 2009

COMMENTS (9)
RECOMMEND (71)
E-MAIL
PRINT

A colleague in Rangoon told me recently that Burma’s regime leaders are aware of the need for a “free press” in Burma and have been cultivating and talking to the local press. So I got excited and asked: “Will there be a revival of a free press soon in Burma?”

My colleague chuckled and urged me to rein in my hopes. “It’s like the chicken in the basket,” he said, citing the Burmese metaphor of chickens held by market traders in rattan baskets. Noting my puzzlement, he gave a lengthy explanation.

Recently, the press in Burma has been given some limited freedom to publish names that were strictly banned in the past.

The names include Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi, the late rebellious poet laureate Tin Moe, who died in the US a few years ago, and the famous satirist Maung Thaw Ka, who died from maltreatment in Insein prison in 1991.

Some publications have recently carried articles and interviews on the planned 2010 general election and have begun debating the issue in very cautious language.

Among them, The Voice Weekly has lately been quite controversial in its editorials and articles, while hailing the election, welcoming the arrival of the 5,000 kyat banknote, the visit of US Senator Jim Webb in August and full of optimism about the chances of improved US-Burmese ties.

The publication’s pro-junta stance has no doubt backfired. Predictably, anti-junta groups inside Burma and exiled activist groups were enraged.

More interestingly, some rival publications in Rangoon, including the best-selling weekly First Eleven Journal, have come out in opposition to the editorial line of The Voice Weekly. The usual suspect, the regime, has even played a role in creating conflict and jealousy among editors.

So the war in the chicken basket began, mused my colleague. Welcome to Burma’s fight for a “free press.”

Burma currently has five leading publishing groups: Living Color Media, Eleven Media Group, the Myanmar Consolidated Media Ltd, Yangon Media Group and Modern Journal Group. Burma’s media moguls—Dr Nay Win Maung, Dr Than Htut Aung, Dr Tin Htun Oo, Ko Ko (Yangon Institute of Technology) and U William—have been running the groups’ publications for years.

All five groups have registered steady growth and the publishers don’t hide their ambition to publish daily newspapers in the near future. Unfortunately for them, however, the generals in Naypyidaw still call the shots.

In military-ruled Burma it is common that editors and publishers, if they are not outright apologists of the regime, compromise and toe the official line so their publications can survive. They have established close ties either to powerful generals or to cronies of the top leaders.

Interestingly, Maj Tint Swe, head of Burma’s notorious censorship board, the Press Scrutiny and Registration Division, is not as powerful as many may have thought.

Even Tint Swe’s boss, Information Minister Kyaw Hsan—once dubbed Burma’s comical Ali because of his blunders (a reference to former Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf)—hasn’t been able to exercise his influence over these local media empires. Although recently sidelined, Kyaw Hsan retains his post for now because of the patronage of Gen Thura Shwe Mann, the regime’s No 3.

Knowing the country needs a “free press” in the post-election period, Snr-Gen Than Shwe, a former psychological warfare officer, and his close associates seem to have direct management and control over publications in Burma.

Informed sources close to the Press Scrutiny and Registration Division say Than Shwe and other top leaders deliberately “relaxed” their control of the local press recently so that some major publications could enter into political debate and mention once banned names. Few dared to question the election and publish critical analysis of the political process in Burma, however, and all publications are required to carry the regime’s propaganda articles.

My colleague predicted that in the near future even privately-run daily newspapers will be permitted, although the generals want to make sure they will remain loyal to the military and the new government.

“Gen Than Shwe is not stupid and he wants to have a colorful mouthpiece, so he is now carefully observing all major publications in Rangoon to see which the future regime could ally with,” he said.  

This would mean that the regime has no intention to restore the spirit of Burma’s once formidable press freedom. The regime has muzzled press freedom and thrown journalists into Burma’s gulag, and it continues to do so.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (9)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

pLan B Wrote:
16/10/2009
Ko Moe Aung:

It is "one moment up, the next down" kind of thing. Look forward to one of these days "doing it" together.

Moe Aung Wrote:
15/10/2009
plan B,

'the economic woes due to the SPDC's relentless approach to holding on to power and the West's callous approach to SPDC intransigence.'

Glad you own approach is a tiny bit more balanced in apportioning blame, and things are looking up from your point of view given the new phase of 'detente'. I'm all for peaceful change though chance indeed would be a fine thing.

So you've been back to the old country; I'm green with envy.

plan B Wrote:
14/10/2009
Ko Moe Aung
Seeing a 9 year-old dying of complication from malaria that can be prevented through simple measures is my "wringer". A prevention that could be afforded but for the economic woes due to the SPDC's relentless approach to holding on to power and the West's callous approach to SPDC intransigence.

I will leave you to decide where the others such as DASSK can be faulted.

Yes,I am biased against any acts that will not "lessen the sufferings of the most vulnerable," and by extension any party or person that promotes the status quo or hinders change.

Thank you. Nice to be back. Not for long.
"So many things to do so little time left"

Moe Aung Wrote:
13/10/2009
plan B,

Welcome back. Good holiday I hope. Been home visiting?

'He may be biased but who are we to fault him after the "wringer" he has been put through?'

I bet you don't need a wringer to be biased. Just look in the mirror. You have to be detached from the subject to be unbiased, and even so not many manage that. Look at those foreign analysts; if not one side or the other, it's some kind of prevailing ideological principle, some orthodox thinking they subscribe to.

plan B Wrote:
13/10/2009
Ko Okkar
I can understand your frustration with The Irrawaddy. Like every institution, this one is no different and must placate the sponsors. It is however a far cry from mentioning the 'C" word to associate with The Irrawaddy.

Through its editing it has educate the interested rather well from various aspects. That is why you, I and Ko Moe Aung are still here.

Just be yourself, to continue pointing out fallacy, lies and ridiculous assumptions, while proposing civil discourses.
The day The Irrawaddy start censorship akin to the SPDC you will see how fast this site shuts down.

Meanwhile remember The Irrawaddy is not only read by us but also from within.
I bet The Irrawaddy knows Than Shwe's IP address.

So please see the merit of Ko Aung Zaw's opinions. He may be biased but who are we to fault him after the "wringer" he has been put through?

KKK Wrote:
13/10/2009
To Okkar:
You need to apologize to Ko Aung Zaw and The Irrawaddy. How can you compare The Irrawaddy with your SPDC's media? Shame on you.

Okkar Wrote:
12/10/2009
Moe Aung,

I'm sorry if my posting hit the nerve on you and like-minded opposition supporters. However, you must accept that truth can actually be painful. You may or may not want to admit, but facts remain that The Irrawaddy represents anything but a free press. Contradictions and hypocracy are ripe in every piece of The Irrawaddy, especially when it comes to censorship. If Aung Zaw wants to claim moral high ground, at the very least, he should have the courage to face up his critics and allow comments that are critical towards him and his work to be posted. After all, what has he got to hide if he has done nothing wrong?

Moe Aung Wrote:
10/10/2009
Okkar's "You are no different" line is getting really tired from too much recycling. The junta's time-honored tactic of flushing out the opposition has been a tested and fruitful one.

At least it's less boring to see a little imagination and color, and the quicker it learns, the more sophisticated and effective control of public behaviour it will manage to exercise.

The 64,000 dollar question is whether it will prove to be a smart enough student of the liberal democracies to accept that liberal reforms in all spheres, not just press freedom, are part and parcel of their true staying power.

There's only one small snag. The regime consistently engages in not so much actual reform as cynical manipulation, relying mainly on open repression and their visceral belief in Mao's dictum - political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The language of the gun is one they truly understand.

May Aung Zaw's dream of returning and establishing The Irrawaddy on Burmese soil soon come true.

Okkar Wrote:
08/10/2009
This is like the pot calling the kettle black. Making noises about censorship coming from the Editor of The Irrawaddy, who censors any comments raised about his own dealings, is rather ironic!

Free Press is not something even Irrawaddy could comprehend... shame on you Aung Zaw and shame on Irrawaddy for all the censoring! You are no different to SPDC censorship board!



More Articles in This Section

bullet How to Select a UN Special Envoy?

bullet Why the 2008 Constitution is the Junta's Holy Grail

bullet Than Shwe and the Waiting Game

bullet A Tip for Asean: Ethnic Reality beyond the Election

bullet Dark Signs of Things to Come

bullet A Mouse Tries to Catch A Big Cat’s Tail

bullet You've Got Mail, Than Shwe!

bullet No Turning Back

bullet Letter from Kathmandu

bullet Change Must Come From Within


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.