SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




COMMENTARY
Beijing’s Burma Agenda
By AUNG ZAW Wednesday, July 15, 2009

COMMENTS (8)
RECOMMEND (19)
E-MAIL
PRINT

Here’s a fact: Burma is an unstable neighbor and a headache for China because of the constant troubles that arise in the military-ruled country with which Beijing has forged a “fraternal relationship.”

So don’t be surprised if China begins to adjust its Burma policy. Chinese leaders are reportedly unhappy with the endless negative press reports on Burma which frequently mention China’s support. 

The press coverage on the bizarre trial of Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi, Burma’s secret missions to Pyongyang and Burma’s unsettled issue with ethnic insurgents along the Sino-Burmese border are all part of  China’s concerns.

Of course, Beijing is not going to ask Burma to introduce democracy or demand the release of Suu Kyi and all political prisoners.

These issues are, according to Beijing’s official stance, internal affairs of Burma and the Burmese themselves should settle those issues. However, China realizes that backing the recalcitrant regime can be costly.

Thus, we are already seeing a subtle policy shift by Beijing’s leaders.

When foreign ministers from Asean and the EU held a meeting in Hanoi in May, Beijing joined the Burma-bashing ministers from Western countries and did not shy away from criticizing the junta over the Suu Kyi trial.

Curiously, Beijing has been increasingly expanding its network to establish contacts with dissident groups in exile. Chinese officials from various government departments based in Yunnan Province, which borders Burma, often come to Thailand to meet exiled Burmese groups, and the frequency of visits has increased—in addition, China has recently did not object to conferences and seminars discussing the Burma issues. This is something the Chinese have learned from watching Burmese exiled-based civil society groups operating in Thailand. 

Recently, the National League for Democracy (NLD), Burma’s main opposition party, sent letters to the Chinese embassy in Rangoon, a sign that the NLD sees China as a potential positive influence.

The question arises: is Beijing looking for alternatives in Burma? 

Let’s be frank: China isn’t interested in Burma becoming a democratic nation. It isn’t voicing complaints about human rights issues; It wants to see a strong and stable regime that can develop economic prosperity and peace in the country.

At the same time, China may be in the process of hedging its bets on Snr-Gen Than Shwe’s regime as the future of Burma.

A case in point: during Maung Aye’s visit to Beijing in June, the two countries signed three documents that included an agreement on economic and technical cooperation, a memorandum of agreement on development, operation and transfer of hydropower projects in Maykha, Malikha and upstream of the Irrawaddy-Myitsone river basin, and a memorandum of understanding relating to development, operation and management of the Burmese-China crude oil pipeline project.

It’s understandable that China wanted to sign these agreements before the election in 2010.

The Burmese press hailed Maung Aye’s visit in the state-run newspapers, claiming that China will protect Burma’s interests in the international arena.

But there’s a trade-off for that protection, and Burma has opened itself up to being influenced by Chinese ideas on how to achieve national reconciliation.

One internal Burmese problem that China wants fixed is the regime’s relationship to the restless ethnic groups along the Sino-Burmese border.

China appears to be supportive of an effort to create autonomous governing regions for Burma’s ethnic minority groups, based on the Middle Kingdom’s own experience with minority groups in China.

In April, the junta ordered all ethnic ceasefire armed group to transform their armies into a border guard force, to operate under the Burmese army. China was not impressed, according to reports. So far, the regime has not forced the issue.

Almost all ceasefire groups, including the largest non-state armed group, the United Wa State Army, have refused to take part.

Wa and Kachin ethnic leaders, who previously received political and military backing from China, sent a letter in December 2008 to Chinese President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao. The letter outlined the ethnic dilemma in Burma as it relates to the 2008 constitution.

In part, the letter said: “We solemnly ask the Chinese government to relay our request to the Myanmar [Burma] government: first, we support the constitutional reform. When the new government forms in 2010, the leadership based on national public election should promise to leaders of the autonomous states [that they] will be part of the high leadership of the new government… [and] build upon the method of management of China’s autonomous region.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (8)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

tocharian Wrote:
22/07/2009
Nat Ko Lay,
You say very clearly what I was trying to express for the last six months. China is extremely ethnocentric and now they have this grand strategy of becoming a dominating global power, economically and politically.

I have lived in the West for some time and I am always surprised how openly Chinese intellectuals (even some university professors) who live in the West would talk to me about these grandiose plans (probably because I'm not white).

Burma is just a "pawn" in their string-of- pearls strategy and all the "almost trivial" local ethnic problems in Burma are easily exploited by the Chinese to serve their purposes (they supply most of the weapons for all the "armies" in Burma anyway. I think it's time for Burma (that includes all the ethnic groups, the NLD and the Tatmadaw) to unite and confront the imminent danger of being swallowed by the empire-building plans of Big Brother China (unless the Burmese are happy to live in a "Chinese Protectorate of Miandian."

planB Wrote:
21/07/2009
Recently the SPDC and CHina concluded a one sided agreement that will enable the Chinese to exploit more Burmese natural resources. The Irrawaddy has in the past proven beyond doubt the SPDC's dependence on China, to the tune of several billion dollars.

Does one really believe that China will like a goverment that will question these one- sided deals signed by the SPDC?

It is incredible that anyone will believe that the Chinese have any other interest than exploiting the natural resources of Burma in mind, given the undeniable evidence. Now N Korea is readying at the trough!

It's high time to examine the policy of the west that it's:
1) Indirectly promoting/easing Chinese dominance/SPDC no-choice reliance on the Chinese.
2) Having no clout whatsoever after having failed to change the SPDC mind's through relentless economic sanctions. Cheered on by charlatans like Turnell and various SPDC haters, anonymous in their respective countries. That benefits themselves but further impoverishes the Burmese citizenry. further!

Nat Ka Lay Wrote:
18/07/2009
Since twenty years ago, I happened to receive and read a document called,"Great China Policy." In short, it is a long term national plan to build a fence around itself. The oceanic shelf starts from south of Kamchatka (Russia) to Bangladesh. The territorial waters limit is 22 miles; not the internationally agreed 12 miles.

The Land frontier will be protected by "follower countries." Please note that this difinition is not "friendly countries." This ideology descended from dictatorship theory: no friends, but followers. If it is a whole country, it must practice the same type of governing system. Otherwise, it must be set up as an autonomous regions near its border and be dependent on China.

China wants our border states to get autonomy. That's why these states dared to refuse the Junta's offer to become border guards. Junta should understand that their master is hitting a wedge.

Shwe Than Wrote:
18/07/2009
We just have to blame ourselves. We are too chicken and too scared to rise up to the military government that is abusing us left and right. China is just a neighbor. They couldn't care less about our affairs. Remember, no pain, no gain.

Nat Ka Lay Wrote:
18/07/2009
The other side of Chinese policy: Five years ago, I was on-and-off to China. Now is continuous. Pity our citizens. People in prosperous regions do not know Burma or Myanmar. Even at Shanghai Airport, check-in counters don't know. Forget to say we are feeding their people and giving our resources for their development. So-called "Paukpaw" friendship is nowhere. I carry a map of Asia when traveling throughout China to explain my passport or the existence of our country. The aged man I met in the plane who stayed in US also does not know our country. So far I found that Chinese leaders are telling their countrymen that everything is self-made and own supply. They are creators of all things and don't worry. We're champions; just pay respect to us only. You will get everything. They are portraying China as standing on its own feet. Our government's China promotion is merely a silly act and for themselves.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
16/07/2009
The Reds will not let the rat (Burma) escape their hands after all these decades, given the prospects for the future.Hence, they will transform Burma's politics and landscape to their liking. Eventually, Burma will be annexed as a province of China, like British colonialists did on New Year's Day, 1886.

Maung Aye's been given the green light and all we need do is watch what happens next.
Of course, Burma's dream of a free and democratic nation would remain as remote as ever; it would be like waiting for Jesus to establish his Kingdom of Heaven on earth.
Anticipating substantial and effective help from the UN, US, EU and others is no more credible than making two parallel lines meet.

China does not give a damn about freedom, democracy or human rights.

Hence unity, resolve and courage on the part of the people of Burma led by Daw Suu's NLD can only save and salvage Burma from the yolk of Chinese-backed military subjugation for the present and future.

tocharian Wrote:
16/07/2009
Why do we always have to "suck up" to Big Brother China? Why don't we just ask them to appoint the next "President" of Burma? The Chinese are mainly interested in the geophysical aspects of Burma, for its natural resources and strategic military goals (string of pearls). They don't really care about the "real inhabitants" of Burma. They have already sent their merchants and their military advisors to control the country. Anyway, all these dams upstream are environmentally harmful and will definitely influence the flood plains of the Irrawaddy river where the burmese grow their food. All because the Chinese are greedy for electricity, gas and jade. That is their strategy. Wake up Burma! Don't become a colony again!

KKK Wrote:
16/07/2009
We Burmese people should open our eyes and see how the Uiqhurs in China have been interacting as an ethnic minority with the dominating Han chinese.



More Articles in This Section

bullet Climate Change and Aung San Suu Kyi

bullet The Next Big Step

bullet The Facts Remain the Same

bullet Time to Inject Pragmatism

bullet Playing With Super Powers

bullet Too Soon for Optimism

bullet The World is not Flat

bullet Pressure Off Burmese PM

bullet Asean Should Review Its Engagement Policy with Burma

bullet A New Political Environment?


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.