SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




CONTRIBUTOR
Than Shwe Maneuvers to Retain Power
By AUNG LYNN HTUT Wednesday, June 24, 2009

COMMENTS (8)
RECOMMEND (82)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

If Burma’s State Peace Development Council (SPDC) holds a successful election in 2010, the Burmese people will lose all hope of freedom and the generals who now rule the country will retain their power.

There are three nominations for presidency in the 2008 constitution—one from the military, one from the Senate or ethnic leaders’ hluttaw and one from Congress members. The Senate and the House then vote to choose the president of Burma.

According to the latest information from Naypyidaw, the military will nominate Gen Thura Shwe Mann and he will be Burma’s president. The Senate will nominate a prominent ethnic leader and the House will nominate a member of the Union Solidarity Development Association (USDA), Kyant Phut. 

After the 2010 election, Shwe Mann will issue a state order that Snr-Gen Than Shwe, Vice Snr-Gen Maung Aye and remaining SPDC members become patrons or advisers of the National Security Council of a new Burmese government. It means Than Shwe and his party will retain their grip on state power.

The military gets 25 percent of the seats at state, regional, district, township and village levels of the Burmese administration, according to the 2008 constitution. The military has a plan to assign deputy regional commanders as “second men” of regional administrations, deputy regiment commanders as “second men” of district administrations, majors or captains for township administrations and other ranks for village administrations.

After Than Shwe assumed state power in April, 1992, he arranged to hold a National Convention. He instructed Secretary (1) Gen Khin Nyunt and Secretary (2) Tin Oo to ensure that the military’s leading role should be one of the principal aims of the National Convention.

Khin Nyunt and Tin Oo objected, saying civilian politics would then disappear in Burma. Than Shwe ignored them, saying he had a long-term plan for a military role in future Burmese politics.

Although he appoints current ministers and the members of USDA who will organize the 2010 election, he still worries about its success. Because of his fear of losing control, he tries to get as many of his people in every sphere of government and pressures others to accept them as well. He is worried about the support he commands and whether his orders will be followed.

To achieve his aims, Than Shwe is using government money instead of his own. He promises that the 2010 election will be fair and honest, so he cannot use his power to influence its outcome without arousing international anger.

There is much discussion among the generals about where Aung San Suu Kyi and her National League for Democracy (NLD) stand. They are aware that if the NLD participates, the party stands a high chance of winning, just as it did in 1990.

There’s a fear among the generals that even among the 25 percent representation reserved for the military, as much as 15 percent might support the NLD. With that prospect in mind, some generals are seeking to exclude NLD officials from running for office.

Ultimately, the generals still have to wait for Than Shwe’s orders. Until recently, he tried very hard to ignore the NLD and to force his ideas on Burma.

The trial of Suu Kyi and the worldwide wave of condemnation it provoked have forced Than Shwe to reconsider his position.

Last month, he sent Shwe Mann to China to seek assurance of support for the junta.
The Chinese leaders requested a meeting with the junta’s No 2, Maung Aye, who visited Beijing on June 15. Foreign Minister Nyan Win is shortly to visit the United Nations in New York.

The ethnic ceasefire groups pose another problem for Than Shwe. The ethnic groups dislike the 2008 constitution and the election plan, and they don’t want to surrender to the Burmese military. They accuse Than Shwe of diminishing Burma’s federal policy and of destroying the Union of Myanmar.

Than Shwe promised ethnic leaders that if the armed groups agreed to non-disintegration of the Union, national solidarity and the perpetuation of sovereignty, he would be ready to talk to them. He promised government support for development in ceasefire areas.

He also promised to allow ethnic politics to be discussed at the National Convention, but then went back on that pledge.

After approving the 2008 constitution, he instructed the ethnic ceasefire groups to surrender and lay down their arms and proposed that their troops should serve as border security guards. The proposal was rejected by the largest ceasefire groups.

Than Shwe will take time to decide on a verdict for Suu Kyi’s trial, hoping international pressure will ease. There are two sayings to describe his frame of mind: “He doesn’t care what anyone thinks. People will forget in seven days” and “If there is tension, he will reduce it.



1  |  2 



Aussiemg Wrote:
04/07/2009
The UN & its envoys are clearly not making any progress or having any noticeable effect on the military tyranny in Myanmar. As the UN could not and did not have any say or influence in the drawing of the one-sided constitution, the best that it can do now is to try and pass a resolution in the UNSC to enforce a strict international supervision to oversee a fair and free elections. If this could be achieved, it can at least be a small but important consolation to the people of Myanmar who have suffered so much under successive brutal military regimes for decades.

ToeToe >> plan B Wrote:
30/06/2009
your comments on...(those who are genuinely concerned about lessening the sufferings of the masses ).... Wrong! The SPDC's Road Map is not the exit to the country's peaceful future, but indeed "safe exit" for Than Shwe and company.

pps12345 Wrote:
28/06/2009
I think that former military officers want to use Burma's uneducated people to overthrow the current military regime and replaced with Khin Nyunt-style fascist regime. I hate all military personnel for their bad contribution to Burma. I hate MIS chief and his officers for torturing Burmese People.

I also recognized why Khin Nyunt supported Ne Win in 1988 uprising. The truth is that all military officers are using all political unrest in Burma to get power. Ne Win used the split between U Nu and U kyaw Nyein to get power. Saw Maung and Khin Nyunt used the 1988 uprising to get power from Ne Win. Than Shwe used the quarrel between Khin Nyunt and Mg Aye to get powerful.

All of Burmese military officers do not love Burma. 100% of Burmese military officers are more interested in their personal affairs than Burma’s national interests. This is why Aung Linn Thut has to stay in USA for his family.


Pecker Wrote:
26/06/2009
Given the amazingly high approval of the 2008 constitution at the referendum and the criticisms of it, what chance is there for the 2010 election to be free and fair? And if there is a reasonable chance it will be free and fair, won't the SPDC delay the election until they have all their vote-rigging and intimidation tactics better organised?

And even if NLD aligned parties win, the constitution is so anti-democratic and anti-ethnic nationalities that it is likely the Union will fall apart, or at least that ceasefires will end.

I cannot see any military members of parliament voting for NLD aligned parties. They have towed the line for the last 50 years and will continue to do so; won't they vote as their Commander-in-Chief wants?

Lastly, if it gets too difficult for the junta, they can just engineer another coup or assassinate whomever they like just as they did in 1947, 1960, 1962, 1988 and 2007. Or they can just ignore the election result (1990). There are plenty of cards left in their deck.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
26/06/2009
Aung Lynn Htut's piece is nearer to truth than any other.
Khin Nyunt's demise from the political scene of Burma was clearly orchestrated, as were Tin Oo's death and Sit Maung's also, all strengthening the fact they died for showing desire for democracy in Burma.
Shwe Mann taking the helm of future pseudo-democratic Burma and Than Shwe, Maung Aye and others assuming strategic positions in the post 2010 election Burma has been the plan since day one and as evidenced in the military constitution.
Anything short of this setup will guarantee Than Shwe's stand before the ICC to say the least.
Daw Suu and NLD must be banned from the political picture of Burma as Than Shwe knows the majority, even those in the uniformed services, prefer Daw Suu and her party for Burma's future and prosperity.
Than Shwe has grabbed the tiger's tail and he is at a loss what to do next, given the international outbursts and the UWSA, Kokang armed groups and others balking at his ploy to disarm them for good as border guards.

planB Wrote:
25/06/2009
All specifics and bias predictions aside, those who are genuinely concerned about lessening the sufferings of the masses should take note that:
1) The SPDC do not need RMTD to continue this present hold.
2) Than Shwe knows what he is doing beyond what is described above.
These two sobering facts should dash the giddy hope of a future without any form of SPDC control.
SOS=Status quo= Future according to SPDC=?

Tide Wrote:
25/06/2009
Arrrhhh......good argument, Aung Ling Htut!
If the junta holds a successful election, then there is no more hope for democracy in Burma because the junta is going to win, as you argue in your opening paragraph.

Are you trying to say the hope will be maintained without a successful election in 2010? What is your point?
If you were Snr-Gen Than Shwe, how would you solve this political impasse? Seriously, how would you? How would you please the NLD and ASSK, international pressure and internal hardliners?

Cheers!



Yan Sai Wrote:
24/06/2009
The article is good, but no evidence source. Just like a good guess, for example Khin Nyunt and Tin Oo objected to military rule. Who believes that? And who cares? Where do you get that from? Show us some evidence.








Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

More Articles in This Section

bullet Don't Expect Much from Burma's Election

bullet 'Diplomacy by Stealth' Needed in West's Approach to Burma

bullet Dividing Political Parties into Groups

bullet With Neighbors Like These...

bullet An Open Letter to Than Shwe

bullet The Price of Privatization and Crony Capitalism

bullet The Shortcomings of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal

bullet More of the Same at Asean Meeting

bullet Stifling Democracy in Burma, the Junta way

bullet Building an Opposition to the Opposition


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.