SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




COMMENTARY
Yettaw Isn’t the Only Fool in this Bizarre Affair
By AUNG ZAW Wednesday, May 20, 2009

COMMENTS (41)
RECOMMEND (56)
E-MAIL
PRINT

World attention is focused on Rangoon and the trial there of Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi and a man who appears to be responsible for her appearance in court—the American intruder John W Yettaw.

Exiled Burmese and Suu Kyi’s colleagues accuse Yettaw of recklessness and plain stupidity. Suu Kyi’s lawyer has called the American a fool.

Yettaw is by no means the only fool in this bizarre affair, however. Consider for a moment the question: who is behind the affair, and why did junta leader Snr-Gen Than Shwe dare to go this far?

Than Shwe, it must be remembered, was implicated in the Depayin massacre in 2003, when Suu Kyi’s motorcade was attacked by pro-regime thugs.  In September 2007, he was again implicated in the killing of monks and activists who peacefully took to the streets.

The September crackdown and subsequent arrests could not have occurred without Than Shwe’s approval.

Under Than Shwe’s command, Burmese Army forces have been guilty of countless crimes against ethnic minorities. The reports of forced labor, conscription, extortion, torture and other human rights abuses are endless.

On this record, Than Shwe is the one who should now be standing trial.

Than Shwe commits his crimes with impunity, in the knowledge that previous protests quickly die away. The former psychological warfare officer knows how to manipulate international opinion and is fully aware of the meaning of global hypocrisy.

Perhaps Than Shwe anticipated the short-lived outcry and outrage that greeted his action against Suu Kyi. He was confident he could get away with the preposterous charge that has now been brought against her—knowing that his confidence could be placed in a company of fools and idiots.

They include hypocritical leaders in the West and Asia and officials sitting comfortably in their UN offices in New York. They acted swiftly, trotting out their customary condemnation of the regime—like so many times in the past.

These people—not just Yettaw—should be nailed. The UN “special envoys,” including Ibrahim Gambari, even UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon himself, all those who put their name to statements hailing Burma’s “progress” and calling for a “new page” of national reconciliation to be turned.

When these crackpots take the podium, don’t they consider consequences of what they say?

Nail, too, their “partners in crime,” who insisted all along that the generals were just misunderstood men who were willing to cooperate with the international community. These misguided experts, scholars, diplomats and apologists—where are they hiding now?

Until Suu Kyi’s arraignment in the prison court, they had been loud enough, defending the regime’s human rights record and belittling Suu Kyi and her movement.

The question of Suu Kyi’s relevance in Burmese politics crops up constantly in discussions I participate in. Perhaps Than Shwe has now shown those who doubt Suu Kyi’s relevance that she remains a force to be reckoned with. Ironically, Than Shwe has caused them to lose face, as they can no longer even justify a policy of engagement.

We have no shortage of fools—not only activists but also some diplomats, government officials and self-appointed experts on Burma. They talk nonsense on Burma—a western ambassador recently told me: “You’ll all be going home after the 2010 election.” What naïve rubbish!

Instead of writing an open letter to Suu Kyi, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown would do better to address large oil companies like US-based Chevron, French Total, Malaysia’s Petronas and South Korea's Daewoo International Corp, which do so much to prop up  Than Shwe and his regime.

US President Barack Obama and French President Nicolas Sarkozy could offer moral support by wiring letters to the leaders of China, India, Russia and Thailand, countries which are among the principal backers of the regime.

The truth is that Than Shwe is still in the driver’s seat. Asean, the UN, China, and the rest of the world are again just reacting to Than Shwe’s latest dirty trick. All the statements of support for Suu Kyi and condemnation of her tormentors will soon evaporate into thin air. Global outrage will then turn into global hypocrisy.



COMMENTS (41)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

plan B Wrote:
28/05/2009
KMA:

A great retort. I stand corrected in my attitude. No more "totalitarian" mind set. Liberal may be. My sincere apology to Eric Johnston.

I am really glad Irrawaddy is doing a fine job keeping the focus on SPDC stupidity amid detractors like N Korea and AFghanistan/Parkistan.

Moe Aung Wrote:
26/05/2009
pLan B,

"..isn't it rather irresponsible if not hypocritical that you persist in overreaching your grasp of another's country's future?"

Isn't it rather totalitarian in your ostensibly liberal mindset that you persist in trying to stop people engaging in the debate? I had no idea only those with all those qualifications, foreign or indigenous, were entitled to speak on this forum. Thank goodness, you're not the one who makes editoral decisions at the Irrawaddy.

pLan B Wrote:
26/05/2009
Eric Johnston,

Have you visited Burma, even as a tourist?
Talked to an expat who can be considered even-handed?
Have studied Burmese history even perfunctorily?
Have relatives that are in a SPDC jail?
Have you check all info for accuracy?
Have you thought through with history in mind the inevitable result of what you advocate?
Have you ever watched DASSK advocacy on non-violence as a means on U-tube?
If any one of the answers is yes, isn't it rather irresponsible if not hypocritical that you persist in overreaching your grasp of another's country's future?
"To restore normality will require force. With enough strength, violence might even be avoided. Strength is needed to back the desire of ordinary Burmese to live normal, decent lives."
What exactly is your stake in Myanmar beyond being allegedly "poisoned" by SPDC elements during your stint as an English teaching Falang back in 2004.
http://www.irrawaddy.org/opinion_story.php?art_id=15617 ????





Moe Aung Wrote:
25/05/2009
Lay Lay,

Reality is not only different but changing all the time.

"Are you willing to die in protest as people power?"

Not only willingness but great courage has been shown by ordinary folk, especially those at the bottom of the heap, time and again against impossible odds. Prime example: 8-8-88.

It may not apply to the majority of middle-class people for whom it's just neither in their comfortable nature to sacrifice for the greater good (the stakes are way too high for them), nor are they desperate enough to feel “to die fighting is better than to die starving” which appears to be a proud Burmese trait cum-survival instinct. Entire villages in the old colonial days turned to dacoity rather than perish.

So, much as I can understand your not unreasonable scepticism, it is rather a pessimistic counsel of despair which we could do without. Please don't join the ranks of doomsayers.

molly Wrote:
23/05/2009
I agreed that Than Shwe is behind Yettaw.
So, send Than Shwe to ICC and take serious action.

Welfred Wrote:
22/05/2009
Hi Ko Aung Zaw. Well done.

Today, 45% of the Burma regime’s current export revenue derives from sales of gas to Thailand. If the Shwe Gas Project goes ahead, it will provide the regime with up to US $24 billion over 20 years, and would further entrench the dictatorship. The profits from the Shwe Gas Project enable the regime to continue abuses and escalate regional security threats. The actions of the Chevron, Total, PTT, Daewoo, CNOOC, CNPC are tantamount to watering the tree which will bear the toxic fruits.

Why have the world leaders failed to stop them? Will they let China and ASEAN manipulate their position of power on Burma for the potential Energy Security and political influence?

soe linn Wrote:
22/05/2009
Dear Ko Aung Zaw,

Thanks for the correction: Aung San Suu Kyi! But only at the beginning. It would be better to use her name all along: Aung San Suu Kyi.

She and all who love her will be very happy to see the correct name used.

aid worker on the border Wrote:
22/05/2009
Talking of fools and self-appointed experts, the International Crisis Group's silence this past week could be cited also. There hasn't been even one comment from them, despite their lip service resolving conflicts globally and promoting national reconciliation in Burma.

It seems a sad reflection on ICG's idea of engagement.

Arnie Wrote:
22/05/2009
There is only one way to change Burma. Obliterate Naypyidaw. I have been traveling to Burma for 20 years and nothing has ever changed. Oh, by the way, I was deported from Burma for taking a picture of the front gate at Insein Prison. That should tell you something about the mentality of these cowards.

People in Burma are suffering because of the cowards/ thugs/ criminals. As was written many times, nothing will ever change in Burma until every last foreign business venture which conducts any commerce in Burma is forced by their respective governments to cease and desist their business dealings in Burma.

Godspeed to Daw Suu Kyi and all Burmese people who are suffering because of the cowards in Naypyidaw.

Aung M.O Wrote:
22/05/2009
This article is a true fact of Than Shwe's game plans, not only to put DASSK behind bars; it may be more than that; because why?

We have very hard evidence of Than Shwe's covert plot to assassinate DASSK in De-Pe-Yinn, using his own thugs to finish her once and for all. Our witness 'Hard' evidences, in a shouting incident - Than Shwe was reported by Gen Kyaw Win (Khin Nyunt assistant) that 'De-Pe-Yinn killings cover-up done' Kyaw Win reported personally to Than Shwe & went on to wonder aloud 'But we, even as MI, didn't know, who did this etc'; then Than Shwe shout at him ' What? I did it myself ; So, What? So, instead of waiting for verdict on DASSK trial, we should bring Than Shwe to ICC with these crimes and a lot more evidences on killings of monks in Sept '07 and crimes against humanity in Nargis crisis; the case of Than Shwe should be pushed to ICC before the case of DASSK is closed; we have very hard evidence for a case against Than Shwe.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
22/05/2009
What's up Sensitive? That's not a big deal as we are dealing with Than Shwe trying to put Daw Suu in prison.

Who calls what is no big deal today, don't you know? Ethnic minorities are ethnic minorities as far as I am concerned for they are the minorities in the first place. Of course they are the nationalities of Burma also like the Burmese.

I should not be responding your piece because you didn't say your name in full like Daw Suu refusing to respond to court for not addressing her full name.

However, I did because I don't want Aung Zaw to respond to you as he has loads of things to do while Daw Suu is in her darkest hour and he has no time for your ilk and kind trying to pick on him for nothing.

My name's George Than Setkyar Heine if you like to know and if you have anything in mind let me know.

However, if you don't mention your full name then you can forget the matter.

Don't pick on people fighting Than Shwe man!
Pick on Than Shwe and we are right behind you, got that?

Moe Aung Wrote:
22/05/2009
super gauk: "the non-violent way is not working."

another coward: "The only thing that can change Myanmar now is armed revolt in the cities."

Whilst we can definitely agree that an armed uprising is not only an option but a necessity given the intransigence of the military dictatorship, it needs to be carefully thought out, planned and prepared.

We cannot afford defeat after defeat and an unacceptable level of sacrifice on the part of ordinary Burmese, both Burman and ethnic nationalities.

An urban uprising must involve detailed but necessarily secret planning - easier said than done.

Leading cells, bases and networks, communications and logistics, town plans and maps, well selected targets, plans for withdrawal, escape and regrouping, safe houses and medical stations, rations, fuel and arms caches.

Above all political work must be done to win over the army rank and file to the people's side in order to secure a fighting chance. A single spark can then start a wildfire.

Eric Johnston Wrote:
22/05/2009
For decades a constant stream of evidence from all quarters of the country has made clear that law and order has long since ceased to exist in Burma.

To restore normality will require force. With enough strength, violence might even be avoided. Strength is needed to back the desire of ordinary Burmese to live normal, decent lives.

It is one thing to state a solution. It is quite another to find the means to implement it. But when enough people are clearly conscious of the requirement, there can at least be a start made to finding the means.

Noise brought down the walls of Jericho. It is by no means certain that noise alone will suffice to bring down the SPDC.



Moe Aung Wrote:
22/05/2009
Oo Maung Gyi: "Nobody will become the savior of Burma. They only want to become robbers of Burma."

Ursus: "Nice words do not help a lot, exploitation of Burma is more important for them than human rights."

Dr W Taw: "As long as these clowns at the SPDC do not threaten Western interests we are going to see very little substantive actions by the West"

Dr Miguel-Angel Meizoso: "were it not for the complicity or lack of appropriate action from so many other governments and international institutions"

Gentlemen, I can't tell you how much I appreciate both Aung Zaw's article and your insightful contributions. All these needed to be said and pointed out.

mgcritique: "those who questioned the relevance of Suu Kyi did insult the Burmese people who yearn for justice and human rights." Absolutely.

"What I cannot put up with is lecturing by apologists and so-called experts about the necessity to engage with the junta" Too right.

We shall overcome as sure as day follows night.



Moe Aung Wrote:
22/05/2009
plan B:

"concern about individuals, whether opportunistic or misguided."
Only you can save us all, O Great Messiah. Need a hand with the generals' shoes?

Sensitive:

"It should be ethnic nationalities and not ethnic minorities."

Way too sensitive. How about ethnic non-majority, and for the Burman - ethnic majority? Even Stevens. Not PC enough?

Wolfgang H Trost,

"Aung Zaw, the author of this commentary, has hit the nail on the head, his words are a much needed reminder of what the crux of the matter is—hypocrisy by some vs. self-serving interests by others—and no outside power is doing anything effective to unseat or help to replace this despotic regime under Gen Than Shwe!"

Definitely worth repeating.

john eichler,

"I hope Than Shwe lives long enough to stand trial in Burma for his crimes."

So say all of us. Shame Ne Win got away with murder. May he roast in the deepest of hell for eternity.

freebird170 Wrote:
22/05/2009
There is no way around it. It is time to kill the generals.

Lay Lay Wrote:
22/05/2009
Well, everyone is upset starting from U Aung Zaw. Reality is different.

Expecting help from Obama, UN & other countries' leaders will never come in near future or the rest of our lives because every leader wants to make money, esp. China, ASEAN & India.

The only one question to everyone & 500,000 Burmese people is: Are you willing to die in protest as people power?

More important question is: Are 60% of Jr Army officers willing to join Daw Suu's party? If not, talking, writing, asking helps from western & UN leaders are useless. And a waste of our time. Our expectation will be not more than beautiful dream.

Ne Win killed our people, the bright future of Burma & Burmese people. Than Shwe is 10 times worst than Ne Win for Burma & Burmese people. When you kill Than Shwe or when Than Shwe die one day, next a few Burmese No 1 Generals will be 10 times worst than Gen Than Shwe.

sensitive Wrote:
21/05/2009
To Aung Zaw,

The media, especially the Burmese, should take note when it mentions the other nationalities in the union. It should be ethnic nationalities and not ethnic minorities. Anyway, the Burmese are also one of the ethnic races in the union. But they never refer to themselves that way. Just as Aung San Suu Kyi wouldn't respond to the court for calling her Suu Kyi. I hope The Irrawaddy corrects itself.

Oo Maung Gyi Wrote:
21/05/2009
Dear Mr. Aung Zaw,

You have written very well to all world leaders.

Nobody will become the savior of Burma. They only want to become robbers of Burma.

Dr Miguel-Angel Meizoso Wrote:
21/05/2009
Congratulations for the truth and insight of this article that goes to the heart of the matter: how a dictatorship so abominable can hold such barbarian power for so many decades in the twenty first century, were it not for the complicity or lack of appropriate action from so many other governments and international institutions such as the 'United Nations' (and its smiling envoy each time he meets the corrupt, evil Junta.)

Dr W Taw Wrote:
21/05/2009
Aung Zaw certainly hit the nail on the head. The US definitions of "human rights" and "freedom of press" are unique, and according to thinkers of developing countries are the most evolved forms of American hyper-imperialism.
They are being used as sticks to beat developing countries that do not fall in line with its economic policies.
One does not have to look far. The Chinese government and Muslims in East Turkistan and the bombing by the US of Al Jazeera's office in Kabul because their freedom of press ended up with them criticizing the Americans are just two of the hundreds of examples. As long as these clowns at the SPDC do not threaten Western interests we are going to see very little substantive actions by the West, and these clowns in their jungle hide-outs are not stupid to realize that.

Thondara Wrote:
21/05/2009
I totally agree with this article. Everybody is a fool and they are in the game of Than Shwe. They are all fools. Their brains are no bigger than Than Shwe's

Moe Gyaw Wrote:
21/05/2009
Since those fools got a higher education in the US and Europe, they seem to have an obligation to come up with new ideas which must be different from mainstream visions. The “River of Lost Footsteps” writer is more symbolic. Way out of touch with the reality is his conclusion. He might've tried to solve the political problems by history books. There are other fools that I hate to name.

Simon Wrote:
21/05/2009
Thank you, Julian. Let's see what happens with the case first. Will she be convicted? If she is not, she is still not eligible to take part in the the elections next year; nevertheless, if released, she could be a keystone to the election results as a symbol of the democratic process.



mgcritique Wrote:
21/05/2009
In my opinion, Than Shwe has gained confidence from his experience with dealing with the international community. He knows well that most of them are hypocrites. The author is right that they should be nailed, too. Actually, those who questioned the relevance of Suu Kyi did insult the Burmese people who yearn for justice and human rights. Our people are fighting against injustice, and Suu Kyi as well as Min Ko Naing are the embodiment of this fight.
What I cannot put up with is lecturing by apologists and so-called experts about the necessity to engage with the junta, looking at the broad picture and taking a longer-term view, as if we don't know the reality. They like to say that addressing socio-economic conditions together with the regime will pave the way for modernization that will lead to democracy. In reality, have the predatory state that causes all the socioeconomic problems. What is most important is finding ways for the rule of law and addressing political problems urgently.

Say Reh Soe Wrote:
21/05/2009
If you oppose this story, you are Than Shwe. Remember, Than Shwe does not kill foreigners, but every day he kills Burmese civilians and ethnic people. I agree with the story.

NY Wrote:
21/05/2009
One hundred and ten percent agree with you, Ko Aung Zaw. You just need to add more idiots like the NCGUB and some exile Burmese groups who are asking the UNSC to send Gambari to visit Burma. Idiots!

plan B Wrote:
21/05/2009
Ko Aung Zaw,


Even though you are right on target about these politicians and business people I am more concern about individuals, whether opportunistic or misguided.
This forum is filled with such.

Like Yettaw (misguided) they have very little knowledge or regard for the history, culture and traditions of the Burmese, and will embark on castigating the SPDC and/or predict the future.
Highlighting only events that will serve their purpose (opportunistic), they are not unlike the SPDC, promoting means that justify dubious endings.
Thus they constantly detract people seeking to participate in a meaningful way to change to become discouraged and give up.
That way, making their radical ideas as the only choice by default, not unlike the SPDC playing their hands now as "Preserver of the Union" (by default here, too).
Meanwhile, they absolve themselves from having to follow through their purported support for ending the suffering of the Burmese masses beyond token aid.

Ursus Wrote:
21/05/2009
Aung Zaw,

You are so right and that makes me sad and angry as well. I also think that the world leaders have abandoned the Burmese people. Nice words do not help a lot, exploitation of Burma is more important for them than human rights.
But I know that more and more ordinary people around the world sympathize with the Burmese people and are ready to support a free and a really democratic Burma once the generals fall.
I understand your impatience after decades of suffering under this illegitimate regime but don't give up your hope!

super gauk Wrote:
21/05/2009
Julian Pieniazek,

If you think the generals in Naypyidaw care about opinions from their own embassies around the world, you are wrong. Let me tell you how it works—they don't read about demonstration news in weekly reports from the embassies. And embassies usually mention it in only about one or two lines in their reports, because this is not something they (the generals and the embassies) care about.
Second, if you want their attention, fear is the only thing they respond to. So instead of demonstrations, I suggest you kill one of the top generals. By the way, the generals don't care about the deaths of junior officers and civil servants.
Apparently, the non-violent way is not working.

another coward Wrote:
21/05/2009
The only thing opposition leaders and the exile media usually do is scream and shout at the embassies and write letters to western leaders. I wonder what has happened to the courage of the Burmese people. The only thing that can change Myanmar now is armed revolt in the cities. Opposition leaders have lost the respect of the people they claimed to represent because they relied too much on the West. They should start Cuban-style resistance. If they think the US has the guts to fight in another Southeast Asian country, they are wrong. I bet even the communists have lost the courage.

Okkar Wrote:
21/05/2009
The truth is no one cares any more. This whole pathetic saga has been going on for so long and people have grown tired of it. The only people who want to prolong all this are opposition supporters, who are making their living and profiting from this mess. Aung Zaw and The Irrawaddy need the deadlocked situation in Burma to go on just as much as Than Shwe needs to keep Su Kyi away from power.

It would be "naive rubbish" for a Western ambassador to suggest that Aung Zaw might be going home after the 2010 election because anyone who is in the know knows that Aung Zaw wouldn’t part with his goose, which has been laying golden eggs for him steadily. He would stay on to fight, not because of political convictions but rather for his own personal enrichment through the misery of the Burmese people.

OHNGYAW Wrote:
21/05/2009
The Burmese military junta arranged and gave financial support for John W Yettaw’s trip, which has caused trouble and danger for Daw Suu in trouble. The junta asked this guy to do what the junta wanted to get Daw Suu into trouble. This guy is unemployed and survives on welfare benefits. How could this guy have enough money to travel around Asia countries? If the US government carefully checks his bank account and sources, you will see some huge deposit of money made indirectly the junta indirectly.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
21/05/2009
In this respect, Than Shwe should be in the dock in place of Daw Suu today!
And Daw Suu is in Insein prison today, because the US, EU, Asean and principally the UN is not living up to their obligations, not to mention reputation.
Giving lip service and issuing statements only on the part of so-called civilized societies have culminated in these woeful scenes in Burma where good people are being bullied and trampled under the heels of the lawless led by Than Shwe and his thugs.
Specifically, Obama should be doing something substantial in Burma's case on his own discretion also, in case he really wants to see changes in the world. Burma is as good a place as any to start with, I say!
The US is the world power promising democracy, equality, freedom, justice, rule of law on this earth since its independence on July 4, 1776.
And the UN also in its charter promised the same to the world citizenry.
Hence, Daw Suu's freedom and democracy for Burma rest in the hands of Obama and Ban Ki-moon, I say.

Wolfgang H Trost Wrote:
20/05/2009
Aung Zaw, the author of this commentary, has hit the nail on the head, his words are a much needed reminder of what the crux of the matter is—hypocracy by some vs. self-serving interests by others—and no outside power is doing anything effective to unseat or help to replace this despotic regime under Gen Than Shwe !
I only beg to differ on one important issue. Than Shwe was not only “implicated" in the Depayin massacre. It could never have happened without his outright approval or more likely instruction. That, among many other crimes against humanity, should make him a prime candidate for the International Criminal Court. It makes me want to vomit when I see UN officials and world leaders shaking hands with this evil maniac.

Josh Wallace Wrote:
20/05/2009
The charge (hosting a visitor) against Aung San Suu Kyi is not preposterous. What is preposterous is the fact that such a law is on the books.

For those who sat out the slaughter of monks and bystanders last year, this is indeed a time to march on Burmese embassies and interests everywhere in the world.

john eichler Wrote:
20/05/2009
Absolutely correct. I have basically said the same things before. We will hear a hue and cry from the western politicians but it will soon die away.
The mechanisms of the junta could be a comical movie if the situation weren't so tragic. I hope Than Shwe lives long enough to stand trial in Burma for his crimes.
The world really needs to pressure China, India and Russia to quit propping up the regime.
Also, the spineless UN needs to get realistic, instead of wringing their hands and doing absolutely nothing for the Burmese people.


George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
20/05/2009
Atta boy Aung Zaw!
You said it all.
Yes, they are dancing to Than Shwe's tune, as I have said often and many times.
Why aren't they going after China?
The Reds are responsible for Burma's woes today.
The world was no longer safe since the day China was given veto power in the UNSC.
Truman fired Gen MacArthur in 1950 and the US lost the initiative. And the Reds bully the world today.
Then George Bush put money into the Reds' pockets and it backfired.
The Reds are going to throw their Renminbi around while making monkeys out of Than Shwe and his thugs, letting them run amok in the country and protecting them from international wrath at the same time.
India is cornered and vital sea lanes to Japan and the Far East are in the Reds' hands today; they are getting access to the Indian and Pacific oceans via Than Shwe's land.
It is high time for the US to effect a representative rule in Burma and defend democracy and freedom or Mr Obama dances the Dragon Dance. His choice, of course!

Zoom Wrote:
20/05/2009
Well written Aung Zaw, and I couldn't agree with you more.

Free Man Wrote:
20/05/2009
A resounding ditto!

Julian Pieniazek Wrote:
20/05/2009
I understand the author's rancor about this atrociously ugly affair but I'm not so pessimistic (nor, admittedly, am I as knowledgeable). In my view the generals, collectively, are no less stupid than the supine and complacent leaders from which they've garnered their support these years and decades.

They have started something here that could easily run out of their control - such blatant victimization of the Burmese nation's beloved icon has already unleashed a roar of anger from around the world that even ASEAN for once could not easily ignore.

The general ogres just have to continue on this track: over 50 million long-suffering people have already had enough of their utterly malign rule. To pile on insult to injury in the way they are doing right now may prove to be just too much for the masses and rank and file.

I call on everyone reading this - don't hold back. Get out in front of the junta's embassies everywhere and make your voices heard.

The time is almost here.



More Articles in This Section

bullet How to Select a UN Special Envoy?

bullet Why the 2008 Constitution is the Junta's Holy Grail

bullet Than Shwe and the Waiting Game

bullet A Tip for Asean: Ethnic Reality beyond the Election

bullet Dark Signs of Things to Come

bullet A Mouse Tries to Catch A Big Cat’s Tail

bullet You've Got Mail, Than Shwe!

bullet No Turning Back

bullet Letter from Kathmandu

bullet Change Must Come From Within


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.