SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




COMMENTARY
Suu Kyi’s Stalker Swimmer
By AUNG ZAW Wednesday, May 13, 2009

COMMENTS (13)
RECOMMEND (15)
E-MAIL
PRINT

Since John William Yettaw was arrested last week, several rumors and speculations have been aired.

Did he really swim across Inya Lake—some two kilometers—to meet Aung San Suu Kyi? If so, what was his motive? Had he really been there before? Who was backing him?

Unconfirmed reports suggest that he managed to find a way into Suu Kyi’s home once before, but was made unwelcome and told to leave.

This time—according to the rumor mill in my dissident circle—he pleaded with Suu Kyi to be allowed to stay there for a few days. The NLD leader, who is currently fighting for her freedom through legal channels, obviously did not want the American stalker there. Apparently, Suu Kyi’s caretaker even threatened to call the police.

Conspiracy theorists believe he was coaxed into breaking into Suu Kyi’s house so that the regime would have an excuse to extend her detention.

Junta supporters would rather see it as collaboration between the Nobel Peace Prize laureate and a foreign intelligence intermediary—a real-life secret agent, an aquatic James Bond.

As a result, Dr Tin Myo Win is under investigation. Opposition members fear that Suu Kyi’s personal physician may be charged if the regime decides to implicate him in the swimmer’s case.

But informed sources conclude that John William Yettaw is no 007. He is simply a weird character who acted alone.

The American had also turned up in Thailand; he met with some exiled Burmese groups and reportedly told them he was working on a faith-based book on heroism.

They said he is interested in Burma’s plight; that his heart is in right place even if his head is not.

And this is exactly what belies the passion of his action—that he did not think it through; that he did not consider the consequences.

If the regime leaders were looking for an excuse to extend Suu Kyi’s house arrest, he has given them one on a plate.  

Indeed, Suu Kyi can be deemed to have broken the “law”—in Burma, you must inform the authorities if you want to invite a guest to stay overnight at your home.   

John William Yettaw probably didn’t know this; he apparently didn’t conduct much research into the knock-on effects of his stupidity.

Burma’s pro-democracy movement has long been an attraction for fantasists, fanatics and adventure tourists. 

Apart from the usual Walter Mittys that roam the Western world, Burma’s self-appointed saviors have included activists, experts, apologists, lobbyists, scholars, opportunists, do-or-die religious zealots and mercenaries.

While the Karen stronghold of Manerplaw remained undefeated in the early 1990s, foreign mercenaries—or “freedom fighters”—flocked to the border to leap Rambo-like to the Karen front lines. 

In August 1999, James Mawdsley, a young Englishman, was arrested in Rangoon after distributing pro-democracy leaflets in the street. It was his third visit to Burma to protest against the military regime. His ambition was to spend time in a Burmese gulag.

He was given a 17-year sentence, but spent only 300 days in Kengtung prison, Shan State, before being released in October 2000 due to mounting international pressure.

Mawdsley was indeed lucky. If he were a Burmese, he would be serving a full sentence and there would be little outcry from abroad.

Unabashed, he later authored a book titled “The Heart Must Break” and threatened to stand in a British election.
 
“Mawdsley is one of the most outstanding young people Britain has produced since World War Two,” wrote David Alton, an independent cross-bench peer and founder of the Jubilee Campaign, in Mawdsley’s book.

But not everyone was so enthused about Mawdsley’s protest.

The Guardian reported: “In Britain, the response to him was ambivalent. There was a degree of cynicism about his professed Christian zeal, and suggestions that he was reckless to have stuck two fingers up at a dictatorship that has slaughtered thousands of its own people. But there was also grudging respect for his conviction, altruism and bravery.”

I remember a Burmese woman in her 30s who was involved in NGO work at the Thai-Burmese border. Bluntly, she told me: “I could not stand that he was talking about Burma and restoring democracy in my country. He has no clue what’s going on in Burma. I’m not going to listen to what he says and I’ve also told my colleagues not to listen to him.”

She added, “By using Burma and our problems, he has tried to seek fame and personal gain. He was a nobody [in London], but by getting involved in Burma, he became somebody.”

Aside from Mawdsley, there are several other do-gooders who could appear on her hit list.

Another young misguided Brit was Rachel Goldwyn, who was arrested in 1999 for singing a protest song in Rangoon.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (13)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

plan B Wrote:
16/05/2009
Stupid is stupid does SPDC.

Now you really shot yourself in the foot.
I just hope you can limp far away without making Burmese people suffer more.

It is still not too late to follow the suggestions below.

Moe Aung Wrote:
15/05/2009
Is it just me or does anyone else feel something worse is lined up for her, like a character assassination? Alleging this bizarre episode, whether by coincidence or by design (conspiracy theories on both sides of the fence already being aired), was more than meets the eye in more ways than one.

Moe Aung Wrote:
15/05/2009
plan B,

Hope you get the SPDC's undivided attention, unlike the US congress.

Now she's really in jail, like your Freudian slips have stated, not just under house arrest.

KKK Wrote:
15/05/2009
This article is great. You are the man, Ko Aung Zaw. There is no way that old american guy can swim without the help of the junta. If he is that strong, he could have been swam across the Pacific Ocean and he would have been beaten Michael Phelps (Bejing Olympic - 10 gold medals winner). Don't you think, Okkar? I only see big pigs with green uniforms on The Mirror and The New Light of Myanmar.

kala phyu Wrote:
14/05/2009
Completely agree with this article. Although I realize that more details will eventually emerge, it is certain, and most unfortunate, that the brunt of Yettaw's reckless short-sightedness will be borne ultimately by the Burmese people.

Half-crazy do-gooders who know nothing about the complexities of the situation in Burma and interfere nonetheless are a gift to the generals. Advice to foreign visitors (I am one): keep your nose out of things that you cannot handle and obey the laws in force, however much you may despise them. You are no use to anybody in jail, and will have plenty of time to reflect on the damage you have caused. And you will have achieved exactly the opposite of what you intended.

Free Man Wrote:
14/05/2009
This is so sad. It already happened, and we can't reverse it.

This illegitimate and inhumane regime will do whatever they want. They have been like this since Day One. Only the people's movement will bring an end to all these injustices in Burma.

I also wonder why the man was allowed to stay there for a couple of days. We will never know until DASSK is free. All we can do is to fight on the unfinished fair and just battle with her spirit.


Thway Ni Wrote:
14/05/2009
Ko Aung Zaw,

You've hit the nail on the head. After the latest news of Daw Suu being taken away, my blood boils even when I take a glance at Yettaw's picture in news reports. For him, his stupidity might be minor. But for Daw Suu, for us and for Burma, the consequences have been dire.

Tide Wrote:
14/05/2009
The military may have deliberately let William into ASSK’s house. William may have been a stalker. But why she let him stay two nights at her place is still a fair question. It is indeed the question of her ability to make appropriate judgments.

plan B Wrote:
14/05/2009
If I were SPDC:

1) I would release ASSK, especially while it has the opportunity not to. No better time than present to show the soft side of the regime and thus help prove desire for reconciliation.
2) Make this idiot Yettaw pay a stiff fine without further innuendos to degrade ASSK’s reputation (Basic Burmese Courtesy). Before kicking him out of Burma.
Nothing hurt more than hitting the pocket book. Must be done quickly before the US raise a stink about protecting its citizen, which can potentially turn in to a showcase of the regime as tyrants again. Hardening both sides’ resolve. The US is known for protecting its citizens.

Do not shoot yourself in the foot if you wish to prove to the world that you are capable of justice outside the realm of politics.


Okkar Wrote:
14/05/2009
There’s no smoke without fire and one thing you can’t do is hide the dead elephant under goat skin. If there is something rotten inside that lakeside villa, the smell is gonna come out one day or the next.

It’s quick for demo-campers to write off Yettaw as mere fantasists in order to preserve the image of Suu Kyi. Media containment and distraction strategy at full swing. I wonder if it would be the same if the story was on the other side. Shamelessly, opposition media often proclaim to bring about truth, justice and democracy through media and journalism - but in reality, they are no better than The New Light of Myanmar or Mirror. At least NLM and Mirror don’t claim to be holier than thou.

So what does this article make of Aung Zaw? A "Suu Kyi apologist”?

Steve Wrote:
14/05/2009
Well said. People not familiar with the situation in Burma would do well to tread lightly. When traveling there several years ago I was very aware that the cost of any mistakes on my part would be borne by others, not myself.

Marta Wrote:
14/05/2009
You are completely right. I agree.

sayarsein Wrote:
14/05/2009
The timing of this event has been either a pure coincidence or an unintentional incident, the implications of this misguided or misbehaving man, are far reaching beyond his imagination. Perhaps, a window of opportunity is now open for the SPDC to deal directly with US State Department on this affair, and certainly, they will not be missed to take appropriate diplomatic credits handling this case. Thanks to Mr Midnight-swimmer.



More Articles in This Section

bullet Climate Change and Aung San Suu Kyi

bullet The Next Big Step

bullet The Facts Remain the Same

bullet Time to Inject Pragmatism

bullet Playing With Super Powers

bullet Too Soon for Optimism

bullet The World is not Flat

bullet Pressure Off Burmese PM

bullet Asean Should Review Its Engagement Policy with Burma

bullet A New Political Environment?


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.