SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




Security Increased for Suu Kyi Verdict


By SAW YAN NAING Wednesday, July 29, 2009

COMMENTS (8)
RECOMMEND (62)
E-MAIL
PRINT

Security was strengthened around Insein Prison in Rangoon on Wednesday morning, and shopkeepers nearby have been ordered to close on Friday, the day the verdict is scheduled in the trial of detained Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

Two police battalions have joined security forces stationed around the prison in preparation for a possible crackdown on protests, according to the sources in Rangoon, who said the authorities were worried about possible protests.

Riot police officers stand guard at a check point on the approach road leading to the main entrance of Insein Prison. (Photo: AP) 
Dozens of Suu Kyi’s supporters have regularly gathered outside Insein Prison on each day of the trial.

Prominent opposition leader Win Tin, an executive of the opposition National League for Democracy, has joined the gatherings.

On Tuesday, Win Tin said he went outside Insein Prison and stayed for about 40 minutes to show his support for his colleague, Suu Kyi.

The final arguments for Suu Kyi’s trial ended on Tuesday, and the verdict is to be announced on Friday.

Diplomats said they heard Suu Kyi comment, “I'm afraid the verdict will be painfully obvious,” in court, according to an Associated Press report.

After Tuesday’s final session, Suu Kyi told her lawyer, Nyan Win, that the proceedings would show “whether or not the rule of law exists in the country.”

Suu Kyi could be sentenced up to five years in prison if convicted. She is charged with breaking the terms of her house arrest. 

Her trial began on May 18 and has been interrupted by several adjournments.

Suu Kyi has spent nearly 14 of the past 20 years under house arrest. Her latest term of detention began in May 2003.



COMMENTS (8)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

plan B Wrote:
06/08/2009
Now we are quibbling about the kind of prison DASSK deserves. How drôle!
1)DASSK does not deserve any persecution let alone imprisonment.
2)SPDC foulness aside, the West's attitude is partly to blame for her continued saga.
3)Lots of organizations are profiting off of the back of DASSK's sufferings.
4)When she was under house arrest just a stone throw away from US embassy, did you see the ambassador make any foray to highlight her plight?

Lip service, hypocritical at best deceiving at worst.

That is why this lady is still in prison.

timothy Wrote:
31/07/2009
I need to clarify about the "Glass Palace" example. I mean how responsible the colonial government was comparing to irresponsible and rudimentary treatments ushered in by the Than Shwe regime towards prisoner Daw Suu and 2,000 others. Politicians in the colonial era preferred life in C-class prisons to daily harder routine outside prison. The government should treat the public gently like their sons and daughters. Government is the biggest slave who serve every good means to masters/ demanding public. Than Shwe need to learn civilised manners and means.

KKK Wrote:
31/07/2009
To Ma Ma:

I don't agree with you. Malaysia and Hong Kong used to be under British Colony. Why Malaysia and Hong Kong are so different from Burma? Don't you see the difference?

Use your common sense. Don't just argue, argue well!

Tide Wrote:
30/07/2009
Hi Timothy,

It may be the reason that the five-star hotel was fully booked for Aung San. Not even C-class rooms were available, I guess. No wonder Aung San was killed.


MyoChitThuNYC Wrote:
30/07/2009
The British government during colonial times were gentlemen compared to the thuggist and uneducated SPDC Junta led by BoGyote KwayGyi Than Shwe.

Ma Ma Wrote:
30/07/2009
Timothy,

You are right. Even now, we are still under the oppression and plans of the British.

Minn Naing Wrote:
30/07/2009
The rule of law in the country is crystal clear—no one is above the law except the SPDC generals.The law in Burma is not rule by the magistrate or the law itself, it is rule by SPDC generals.

timothy Wrote:
30/07/2009
Please read the book "The Glass Palace" written by Amitav Ghosh. We can see how the British treated the deposed King Thibaw and Supayalat with full responsibility as a captor. Supayalat scolded the district collector of Yadanagiri when the first princess fell pregnant with a coachman. When the collector described it as a scandal within the royal family, the queen said "there is no scandal in what my daughter has done. The scandal lay in what the British have done to us: in the circumstance you have reduced us." It is the responsibility of the captor for the wellbeing of Daw Su. The Burmese junta does not understand the basic duty of a captor. The colonial age was not good but it was much better than the situation right now. In old days politicians stuck the George V stamp upside down on envelopes and sent them to the governor. For insulting the King, the politician went to jail admitting that he did this crime. He was put in a C-class, 5-star hotel for politicians under British rule.





Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

More Articles in This Section


bullet Authorities Threaten Violence at Rangoon Strike

bullet End of February Deadline for BGF

bullet Eggs Withdrawn at Markets after Flu Outbreak

bullet Returning Karen Refugees Fear Landmines

bullet Burmese Navy Participates in Asia-Pacific War Games

bullet Celebrating Shan National Day

bullet Burmese Rock Star-Journalist Wins International Award

bullet International Lawyers Question Thailand's Security Law

bullet Karen Refugees Warned Not To Talk

bullet Thai-Burmese Border Camps Braced for New Refugee Flow


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.