Network Rejects Myanmar’s Imminent National Education Bill
TAKING TOO LONG?
CLICK/TAP HERE TO CLOSE LOADING SCREEN.

Network Rejects Burma’s Imminent National Education Bill

Members of the National Network for Education Reform give a press conference in Rangoon on Tuesday. (Photo: Yen Snaing / The Irrawaddy)

Members of the National Network for Education Reform give a press conference in Rangoon on Tuesday. (Photo: Yen Snaing / The Irrawaddy)

RANGOON — A network of educational organizations has rejected a new bill approved by Parliament last month, saying it does not remove Burma’s education system from central government control.

The National Network for Education Reform (NNER)—which is formed of educational, political and religious organizations—issued a statement Tuesday saying the current draft of the National Education Bill did not include many of its key recommendations. NNER has held discussions nationwide over the past two years on education reform in Burma, and said it strongly disagreed with nine key parts of the current draft.

The bill—passed by the Union Parliament on July 30, but not yet approved by the president—is meant to overhaul Burma’s education system, which has suffered from underfunding and overbearing control under previous governments.

The bill calls for the formation of a National Education Commission (NEC) and a Higher Education Coordination Committee, two powerful bodies that NNER said were “not necessary” and would only preserve central government control of education.

“Universities and colleges must be autonomous and, by necessity, they may cooperate on democratic principles. For academic quality to be assured, assessments must be done by a team of independent specialists,” the statement said.

Arkar Moe Thu, secretary of Myanmar Teachers’ Federation, told The Irrawaddy that the NEC, which will be headed by a Union-level government official, was simply a reincarnation of previous government bodies that centrally controlled—and stifled—Burma’s education system during military rule.

“They have put the NEC in the bill just to change the name,” he said.

Measures in the bill guaranteeing autonomy to higher education institutions were undermined by the creation of the coordination committee, which will have ultimate control over establishing and closing universities, Arkar Moe Thu said.

“They say they will give autonomy to universities, and they want to claim that the Higher Education Department will not exist,” he said.

“Then, they substitute it with Higher Education Coordination Committee, which will control the finances.”

NNER said the current bill ignores calls for mother-tongue languages to be used in instruction in ethnic states, and is discriminatory in its articles dealing with children with special educational needs.

The bill also contains a definition of education that is reminiscent of Burma’s authoritarian history.

“National Education is to cherish, protect and promote the essence of all ethnicities’ languages, literature, culture, arts, traditional customs and historical heritage, and to nurture human resources who have good moral and character and who are able to think correctly, and education that helps state development according to the needs of the age,” the bill reads.

ThuThu Mar, education policy coordinator at NNER, said the bill’s definition “belittled” education and raised concerns about education serving the political system.

Thein Lwin, spokesman of the National League for Democracy’s education network, said that since Basic Education schools would remain under the direct management of the Ministry of Education, central control would persist.

“It’s limiting our teachers’ rights and creativity like in past years,” he said.

“We object to this. We want our schools to be free and democratic. We want the schools to be freely managed, in accepting students, the appointment of new teachers and in drawing up the curriculum.”

The statement by NNER recommends that “the ministry rather should play the role of facilitator; the school management should be done by the respective school boards which constitute the school principal, the teachers, parents and respectable citizens.”

President Thein Sein has sent the current draft of the National Education Bill back to the Union Parliament with 25 points of for further discussion. According to the Constitution, the president may send a bill back to Parliament within 14 days of its passing, but if it is approved again by lawmakers it will pass into law automatically within seven days, with or without presidential approval.


2 Responses to Network Rejects Burma’s Imminent National Education Bill

  1. Nothing seems rightly done by this idiot regime. We all get passed off.

  2. Dear Sir,

    Up to 45% of rural Mon people fled to Thailand for jobs, especially in Rubber plant, fishery, construction, housemaid and other factory alike works. From the late 1980s until the present, most Mon children have been living with grandparents at home while their parents have been working in Thailand. They saved money that enable their children to complete Year 10 (10 Class) and higher education with high cost because of the imposed fee. However, after 10-15 years of learning from high school to the university degree, these Mon children are not allocated decent job either in the public services or other government’s enterprises. As you aware, city based teachers and tutors are the winner of the education sector but the loser are the farmers, who work from the sun raise til the sun set but they are not well cared by our government, especially by our educated class. It is time that our local leaders, and government review the structure and the proportion of job allocation to them. I am the victim of the system because I even could not attend public school due to hardship of my parents. I am now 49 year old but I am learning from all of my life spam. Over to you Sir!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>