SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




Japan and Southeast Asia Take Stock of China's Rise


By SIMON ROUGHNEEN Saturday, February 20, 2010


COMMENTS (6)
RECOMMEND (79)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

BANGKOK — As China's economic and political rise makes itself felt in Asia, Japan and Southeast Asia face serious foreign policy dilemmas in the coming years.

In 1990, Japan's economy was twice as big as the rest Asia combined, and the country looked set to challenge America's global economic primacy. After two decades of flat performance, however, this has changed. Some projections claim that China is already the second largest economy in the world, having overtaken Japan, and others predict that the Chinese economy will be 5-6 times larger than Japan's within the next 40-50 years.

Adding to concerns about Japan's position in Asia is recent friction in its relationship with its most important ally, the United States. Despite wrangles between Tokyo and Washington over naval bases and troop deployment in Japan, however, the alliance between the two countries is steady and remains crucial to security in the wider region, Prof Takashi Shiraishi, currently a member of the Japanese cabinet office, told a forum at Chulalongkorn University.

Supporting this view is the fact that distrust of China still outweighs Japanese public resentment of the US presence. According to opinion polls, more than half the population have a negative opinion of China. Prof Kitti Prasirtsuk, a Thai academic based at Thammasat University who specializes in Japanese politics, said that there is a growing wariness in Japan of Beijing's longer-term strategic intentions.

While it is almost impossible to assess Beijing's long-terms goals, predicting what might happen within China in the coming years—something that will affect how the country projects its new-found power into the 21st century—is even more difficult. This has complicated the debate over whether China wants to become a “responsible stakeholder” in global affairs, or prefers to continue engaging with the rest of world purely in terms of perceived self-interest.

Either way, “We need create a situation where it is in China's interest to work multilaterally, and integrating China into the global economy is the way to do it,” according to Shiraishi.

Whether or not China sees things this way is unclear. It has recently launched a “Buy China” drive which foreign investors and multinationals believe will give Chinese businesses an unfair advantage within the domestic market. It is thought that senior Chinese business leaders, who are often former military cadres, want to corner the vast Chinese market and use this as a platform for Chinese enterprise to challenge Western and Japanese multinationals on the global stage.

Meanwhile, the US has long pushed for a revaluation of China's currency, insinuating that Beijing gives rhetorical support to free trade but unfairly undermines competitors through a skewed yuan valuation.

The key to maintaining regional security in the coming years is to interlock China more closely with the regional political and security architecture, according to Shiraishi, who says there is a need to refashion security to fit better with the economic realities of the broader Asia-Pacific region.
“China, Vietnam and Myanmar [Burma] are all part of the regional economic system, but remain outside the US-led security system that has been in place since the early 1950s,” he said.

Recently, Japan, Australia and China have floated similar-sounding ideas for a form of Asia-Pacific community, with the major sticking point being whether or not to include the US.

However, China's rise has provoked a reassessment of military needs among some US allies. In May 2009, Australia issued a new defense white paper advocating a substantial upgrade and expansion for the country's defense forces to better enable it deal with a rising China and contribute more forcefully to the US military alliance.

Asked by The Irrawaddy if Japan was thinking along the same lines, Shiraishi intimated that a new defense plan was being considered at the moment. He would not go into further detail, but said that Australian-Japanese-American naval cooperation was key to Pacific maritime security. The new Japanese government has made noises about resetting the US-Japan relationship on a more equal footing, which if pushed would likely see Washington demand that Japan increase military spending and do more to assist in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

For now, however, Japan's main regional security worry is North Korea. China is seen in some quarters as the key to resolving the North Korean nuclear issue, though this may overestimate Beijing's influence over the regime of Kim Jong Il, which now has nuclear weapons and would likely be loathe to give these up.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (6)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Kerry Wrote:
28/02/2010
Dear Min Ko Naing

It took Australia 230 years to clean up its act. The process of full healing from ignorance takes time.

Yes Japan was brutal. They also know the taste of nuclear burns, and oppose it for all humanity.

Yes the US has committed many crimes.

The law of karma DOES operate in perfection.

But Burma must decide to go for the freedom it deserves, and for this it can be supported by the free world, so you can decide your own future, not one dominated by even more brutal dictators or modern colonisers.

Democracy IS real and possible. You have everything in play for success this year.

But not through a rigged election and more brutality.

Moe Aung Wrote:
22/02/2010
In the past Western countries saw growth in their domestic markets an essential part of the economy as much as international trade and commerce. The Americans fought a civil war for supremacy over the cotton industry in the south which relied on slave labor vs the northern manufacturers who did not. Both depended on markets to export.

A burgeoning domestic market strengthens a nation's economy in a more durable manner than having to rely on foreign consumption subject to the vagaries of the global economy made much worse today by the speculative financial markets that have little bearing on production and consumption.

Capitalist China (communist only in name but still totalitarian in rule) was always going to pose a greater threat than Red China ever was despite all the demonization and scaremongering. Expansionism is second nature to capitalism, and globalization immensely conducive to it. Still if the nukes are any kind of deterrent, nobody's likely to start any funny business.

Fike2308 Wrote:
21/02/2010
more right wing fear mongering misinformation "news" gotta love it.

tocharian Wrote:
21/02/2010
The West is still so naive about China. "If you give them a little finger they will take over the whole arm". Non-Chinese Asians, especially Burmese should know that from the long history of Chinese empire-building ambitions.

For millenia, Zhong Guo (The Middle Kingdom) has regarded the periphery as populated by barbarians waiting to be pacified civilized and ultimately sinicized. Of course, Chinese ae aware of ethnic minorities like Tibetans, but they would treat them like quaint touristic attractions (Shangri-La).

Chinese society is convinced of their cultural superiority (remember the opening ceremony of the Peking Olympic Games?) and they certainly have hegemonic ambitions in Asia (string of pearls strategy). There is not much the US can do to prevent this, especially in a country like Burma, which is practically a chinese colony (even Mandalay)

In the photos in Myanma Ahlin you see a lot of chinese "advisors" building dams, pipelines, bridges, roads, etc.

Long live Mian Dian!

Ben Gee Wrote:
20/02/2010
It take two sides to be friend or foe. Will China invade other countries in the near future? Very unlikely unless provoked. China has as much land and people as its government can handle. Any more people will create nothing but trouble for the present government. As for land, 75-80% of China's land mass is still under developed. It will take China another 50-100 years to fully develop. Just to bring water from the south to north China will take 40-50 years. Even the mighty US has more than enough trouble in military adventures. China will very be unlikely to make similar mistakes.

Min Ko Naing Wrote:
20/02/2010
Facts: both US and Japan are most aggressive militarily, economically and selfishly dominated this part of the world historically.

Japan still does not accepting its historical responsibility during WWII and is trying to brain wash its younger generations with false histories.

American and Australian were involved the most gruesome human rights violation historically. Please just ask the indigenous natives whose populations are disappearing. Ask their former slaves and other minority within the borders of those countries.

Note there were no complains about the US/Japan, the two largest economies, when they dominated Asia with strong military and financial tactics against the locals.

I grew up in Burma and live in US. I had a colorful views of US and Japan when I lived in Asia. I was blind and ignorant. I learn the truth only after I educated myself by researching in many leading US libraries.

Burmese generals and Chinese communist leaders are dirty, just as US/Japan foreign polices are full of self interest.

Be TRUTHFUL as Buddha had said








Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

More Articles in This Section


bullet Than Shwe Fears Snipers and Suicide Bombers

bullet Government No Help to Stranded Pegu Residents

bullet Only State Proxy Parties to Compete in Naypidaw

bullet Vote USDP Orders PM

bullet New Army Chief Supported Massacre

bullet Than Shwe to visit China

bullet A Letter from Arakan State

bullet KIO Calls for Free and Fair Election

bullet Floods in Pegu Force Residents to Flee

bullet Ethnic Political Parties Fielding Candidates


Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.