SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




More Differences Between the Haiti-Burma Disasters


By SIMON ROUGHNEEN Thursday, January 28, 2010

COMMENTS (3)
RECOMMEND (71)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

BANGKOK— Haiti President René Préval on Wednesday said that the country's legislative elections would be postponed indefinitely due to the impact of the Jan. 12 earthquake. The change of plans stands in stark contrast to the Burmese junta, which didn't let the devastation wrought by Cyclone Nargis in May 2008 get in the way of a nationwide constitutional referendum that proceeded as planned mere days later.

A Haitian girl is rescued by a French team after being in the rubble for more than two weeks in Port-au-Prince on January 27. (Photo: Reuters)

Haiti's polls were scheduled for Feb. 28 and were seen as an important next step in stabilizing Haiti's fragile democracy. Brazil-led UN peacekeepers have operated in Haiti since 2004, after politicized gang violence.

“The electoral campaign should have opened tomorrow and for obvious reasons, that won't be able to happen," Préval said in an interview at his temporary office.

Préval has been criticized by many Haitians, particularly in the vocal and influential expat lobby based in the US, for his apparent reticence after the earthquake. A New America Media/Bendixen & Amandi poll surveyed Haitians living in South Florida and across the country and found 63 percent disapprove of how Préval's government has responded to the natural disaster.

With government buildings destroyed, the government has been forced to meet at a police station and under a nearby tent.

Préval says he did not want to be seen to be milking the disaster for public relations benefits. He said that as he toured Port-au-Prince the night of the earthquake and the next day, ``A lot of people would have chosen to go and be filmed touring hospitals, to talk to the injured. . . . I chose to get to work and try to find help to deal with the catastrophe.''

Already dependent on foreign aid for around 60-70 percent of the national budget, Haiti's reliance on aid will increase in coming months and years, with 10-year rebuilding plans costing billions of dollars being discussed. Haitian expats remit an estimated US $1.5-1.8 billion per annum, far exceeding the amount of aid and keeping Haitian families afloat amid nationwide poverty.

Haiti's Electoral Council offices collapsed in the recent earthquake, while UN staff assigned to work with the commission were killed. The president added: "For human and technical reasons, it is obvious that the electoral process won't be able to proceed as we had planned. Now we have to discuss with the various parties what will happen, what will be the next plan."

Just as Haiti is the poorest country in the western hemisphere, Burma is one of the poorest in Asia— though Burma has a wealth of natural resources that Haiti cannot match.

Regardless, the junta put severe limits on international assistance getting to the disaster area. In the days after that disaster, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called for the referendum to be postponed in full to concentrate on the "national tragedy."

The junta was criticized for diverting critical resources from survivors toward the referendum, including evicting refugees from shelters so they could be used as polling stations.

"Instead of putting all resources toward saving the lives of the victims, the military is concentrating on legalizing military rule in Burma forever through a sham constitutional referendum," said a joint statement from the All Burma Monks Alliance, the 88 Generation Students and the All Burma Federation of Student Unions released after the Nargis disaster.

The referendum and the results—a 93 percent vote in favor of the controversial new constitution—was widely dismissed as rigged and massive fraud and intimidation was reported by Burmese who managed to get information out of the country.

The poll was part of the junta's self-styled democracy “road map,” which includes elections to be held sometime this year. Last week a senior junta official said that Aung San Suu Kyi would remain under house arrest until November, likely to be after the election takes place.

However, no electoral law or timetable has been decided upon. The 2008 Constitution and the elections together are expected to put a civilian veneer upon continued military rule in Burma, leaving the main opposition parties undecided on whether or not to participate in the elections.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (3)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Myanmar patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
03/02/2010
Robert, Do you want to know the answer? The truth? Burma's most revered leader General Aung San was assassinated by the English sympathisers of Karens who fought on the British side against the Japanese -(BBC: Who killed Aung San? presented by Fergal Keene). A Burman called U Saw was framed and executed; just another Burmese life. Who cared?
Who cared if thousands of Burmese died? It will only add to the disgrace of the SPDC. For the past sins starting with the 1962 military coup, the soldiers had not been loved by the people; both had been abused. Yet they cannot come together for political, structural reasons; as such, it was predictable that post-Nargis, we could not envisage soldiers shoulder-to-shoulder with the people as in the case of the China earthquake. Soldiers are not to blame;their bellies depend on paymasters.
Do you understand what we are trying to say? As for The Irrawaddy, it's unlikely they have the resources to investigate throughly.

Robert Wrote:
29/01/2010
We know that the SPDC was criminal in its post-Nargis response without question.

What is the biggest diffeence between Haiti and Nargis? One was an earthquake that could not be predicted whilst the other was a cyclone which was totally predictable in its intensity days before it struck yet nobody warned people, not the SPDC, not the INGO's,not the UN, not the foreign embassies, all of whom knew from extensive coverage both inside and outside MM on CNN weather especially and also BBC.

I was there and knew days before what would happen and I tried. 150,000 died but maybe warnings would saved some thousands of that number. But it never happened. Why?

Also why does The Irrawaddy not try to find answers to this question as the information can be readily sourced. One day the truth will come out all those that ignored to warn people will be shamed.

timothy Wrote:
29/01/2010
If it is not the crime against humanity, I am talking about the let-them-die policy of Than Shwe during the Nargis Cyclone disaster, what else can United Nation say? Than Shwe should be put on trial for his crimes against Humanity. It hurt me when I watch ORPHAN OF CYCLONE documentary. THIS IS CRIME. THIS IS CRIME. THIS IS CRIIIIIIIMMMMMEEE!








Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

More Articles in This Section


bullet NDF Leaders Told to Appeal Past Treason Charges

bullet New US Law Could Force PTTEP Disclosure

bullet US Senators Want UN Investigation of Burma

bullet Thai Minister's Statement Spreads Fear in Camps

bullet Burma's Generals Meet North Korea's FM

bullet USDP Constitution Maintains Junta's Policies

bullet USDP Assigns Constituencies to Ministers

bullet NLD Members Meet ILO Representative in Rangoon

bullet Burmese Rank No. 1 in Malaysia Detention Center Deaths

bullet US Wants Burma-North Korea 'Transparency'


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.