SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




NEWS ANALYSIS

Assessing the US-Asean Summit


By SIMON ROUGHNEEN Thursday, November 19, 2009

COMMENTS (2)
RECOMMEND (52)
E-MAIL
PRINT

BANGKOK — The meeting between US President Barack Obama and his Asean counterparts has been mostly well-received, though some misgivings remain.

Obama made a much-anticipated call for the unconditional release of Aung San Suu Kyi and Burma's political prisoners during the hour-long summit, apparently reiterating language used during a speech given in Tokyo on Saturday, where he said that the Burmese junta needed to take “clear steps” toward democracy, including the unconditional release of all political prisoners, an end to conflicts with minority groups and a “genuine dialogue” with the opposition and minorities on a “shared vision for the future.”

Burmese opposition groups and political prisoners have backed the move, with Suu Kyi now asking for a meeting with Sen-Gen Than Shwe, the junta strongman, to discuss possible ways to get US sanctions on Burma relaxed.

Obama and Burmese Prime Minister Thein Sein—who observers dismiss as a messenger boy— sat four seats apart at the US-Asean meeting, Although the US President's comments were given to the entire gathering, and not as part of any one-on-one discussion with Thein Sein, they put the State Peace and Development Council on notice that the US is serious about reform, according to Indiana University's David C. Williams.

Williams is a constitutional law expert who has advised Ibrahim Gambari and testified to the US Congress on Burma.

Williams told The Irrawaddy that “Obama's performance should also reassure those who worried that holding a dialogue with the SPDC would make us appear soft: if anything, Obama's very public demand in front of the Burmese prime minister was a dramatic repudiation of the regime's oppressive ways.”

Whether or not Asean can or will supplement the US efforts remains to be seen, The joint US-Asean statement issued after the summit did not mentioned Suu Kyi or political prisoners directly, leading to some disappointment.  The US apparently was out voted on its request seeking the inclusion of stronger language in the first draft.

Asean seems divided on how to proceed. Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak said that the reference to Suu Kyi and political prisoners was dropped from the statement, because “there is no consensus on this matter.”

Member-states such as Singapore and Thailand do lucrative business with the junta, and others such as Vietnam have come out strongly against any attempt to free Suu Kyi, regarding this as a domestic matter which Asean should not interfere with.

Vietnam may be hedging against any scrutiny of clampdowns on minority religious groups such as Catholics and various Buddhist sects. Indonesia has been more outspoken about the need to free Suu Kyi, but it seems that Asean—despite its new Charter and Human Rights Commission—does not appear to be able to effectively support US efforts to nudge Burma toward reform.

Carlyle Thayer told The Irrawaddy that despite some flaws, the statement is a positive step.
 
“It is significant that the paragraph on Myanmar in the US-Asean joint statement is one of the longest eclipsed by a paragraph on non-proliferation,” he said.

Thayer is based at the Australian Defense Academy in Canberra. He said the US and Asean now have some bedrock to combine on pushing reform on Burma , saying “The US and Asean reached common ground and agreed on long-term goals.”

It is still not clear whether the US understands just why the junta wants to talk right now, as American diplomat Scott Marciel mentioned when speaking to journalists in Bangkok recently. His boss, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kurt M Campbell, told a US Congressional hearing on Burma that sanctions have been no more than “modest inconveniences” to the generals, suggesting that getting these removed is not at the top of the junta's list. This could mean that the US carrots – the removal of sanctions – are not sufficiently enticing to persuade Than Shwe to acquiesce to President Obama's requests.

On the other hand, when PM Thein Sein addressed the UN General Assembly recently, he made a case for the removal of sanctions, a plea that has been made numerous times in recent months by junta spokespersons.

The Obama administration is clearly seeking ways to get around the impasse.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (2)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
20/11/2009
"Can democratic elections, even with the international community's stamp of approval, produce a democratic outcome in Myanmar [Burma] when the Constitution that it would legitimate is structured to retain military rule with no significant checks and balances?"

John Dale's question is the answer to Burma's dilemma today. Burma will remain under the military boot as long as men in uniform hold a monopoly on power.

No doubt the 2008 constitution guarantees the military the supreme power in the land.
And the soldiers will never hand over power to the people.

Daw Suu's liberty and the participation of the NLD and other parties in the 2010 elections, whether free and fair or not, is no longer relevant. It would only lend a hand in legitimizing Than Shwe as undisputed despot.

Thus, Obama should press for constitutional review in addition to Daw Suu's freedom, holding dialogue and all inclusive political process before 2010 deadline.

plan B Wrote:
19/11/2009
" ... Burma that sanctions have been no more than “modest inconveniences” to the generals, suggesting that getting these removed is not at the top of the junta's list. This could mean that the US carrots – the removal of sanctions – are not sufficiently enticing to persuade Than Shwe to acquiesce to President Obama's requests."

Thank you Mr Roughneen for highlighting the West's "let's talk, but nothing else" policy.





Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

More Articles in This Section


bullet Authorities Threaten Violence at Rangoon Strike

bullet End of February Deadline for BGF

bullet Eggs Withdrawn at Markets after Flu Outbreak

bullet Returning Karen Refugees Fear Landmines

bullet Burmese Navy Participates in Asia-Pacific War Games

bullet Celebrating Shan National Day

bullet Burmese Rock Star-Journalist Wins International Award

bullet International Lawyers Question Thailand's Security Law

bullet Karen Refugees Warned Not To Talk

bullet Thai-Burmese Border Camps Braced for New Refugee Flow


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.