SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




NEWS ANALYSIS

Burma: Catching Two Fish at Once?


By SAW YAN NAING Wednesday, November 4, 2009

COMMENTS (7)
RECOMMEND (29)
E-MAIL
PRINT

The visiting US delegation’s talks with the Burmese regime, ethnic minority groups and the opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi has coincided this week with the news that the China gas pipeline project is finally under way in Arakan State.

Few things are coincidental in Burma, and several analysts questioned whether the timing of the two initiatives was planned by Burma’s generals or whether, in fact, the US and China were competing to win influence among the generals ahead of each other.

Could it be that the pariah state was effectively catching two fish at once? It would surely be a sunny day for the military elite’s bank accounts if they could consolidate their pipeline deal with the Chinese while simultaneously convincing the Americans to lift sanctions.

China's state-owned National Petroleum Corporation announced on Tuesday that construction has finally started on a pipeline that will transfer Middle Eastern and African oil from the Indian Ocean through Burma to Yunnan Province in China’s southwest.

The multimillion dollar pipeline project will also pipe natural gas from Burmese waters in the Bay of Bengal to China.

If Beijing is to revert to talks with Naypyidaw concerning its energy needs, the savings it will make bypassing the Malacca Strait, and a timeline for constructing the pipeline, then it will likely have to curb its criticisms of the junta’s policy to wage war on Chinese-blooded ethnic groups such as the Kokang and the Wa, and reassess its claims for damages caused by Burma’s government forces during their campaigns against the ethnic armies and condone the resulting flood of refugees onto Chinese soil.

The US has moved hastily to overturn the Bush doctrine of sanctions on Burma’s military rulers since the Obama administration came to power earlier this year. After an initial hint by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at engagement with the generals, the US moved quickly into the spotlight in August by sending Senator Jim Webb to Naypyidaw—where he went a full step further than UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon by physically meeting with junta strongman Snr-Gen Than Shwe.

In September, Burmese Premier Thein Sein attended the UN General Assembly in New York, the first time a Burmese leader had done so in 14 years. Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Nyan Win took advantage of the cooling climate to meet Webb at the Burmese embassy in Washington.  

Most Burma analysts say the regime is trying to find a balance—it wants to maintain a strong relationship with Beijing (without being entirely dependent on China) while aiming to establish better connections with the new US administration.

To that end, the Burmese authorities on Wednesday allowed a US delegation, led by Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kurt Campbell, to meet with Suu Kyi, leaders of her National League for Democracy, and some ethnic representatives. 

But most analysts warned that it was too early to be optimistic about results from the US delegation’s visit.

“We can’t expect much from the current visit as the US delegation is just a fact-finding mission,” said Win Min, a Burmese analyst in Chiang Mai, Thailand.

By allowing the US delegation to meet with opposition groups, the regime is relaxing some of its restrictions on dissidents with the aim of having the US lift sanctions on Burma, he said.

Larry Jagan, a British journalist who regularly covers Burma issues, said, “I think this is a part of Than Shwe’s usual approach to international relationships. He is trying to balance China’s influence in Naypyidaw. But, he will keep Burma’s relationship with China strong.” 

Sean Turnell, an economist at Australia's Macquarie University who produces the Burma Economic Watch report, said, “I think the regime are attempting to assert that they are not wholly dependent on China, and see the opening of a dialogue with the US as a way of presenting this.” 

However, he said that sanctions on Burma won't be lifted in the absence of genuine reform in Burma, and he doesn't see any change on this front for the time being.

“For the moment, it's hard to be anything but skeptical. We have been down this road before,” he said.

Another Burma watcher, Jeff Kingston, the director of Asian Studies at Temple University Japan Campus, said that the Burmese generals are looking to balance their dependence on China by pursuing better ties with the US—but only on their own terms.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (7)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

plan B Wrote:
05/11/2009
If the SPDC regards this present golden opportunity of:
1) Exit strategy.
2) Remaking themselves accordingly for "1"
3) Serving all citizenry as a true government.

Instead of:

1) Fishing for their own self interest.
2) Enjoying the short accolades of "dancing with the superpowers"
3) Thinking that they have the West and everybody else just where they wants them

One should know how difficult it is to "catch one fish" with bare hands, let alone two. Historical examples of overreaching abound.

tocharian Wrote:
05/11/2009
The more the "West" isolates Burma the more it becomes a Chinese colony. The Chinese economy needs natural resources. They are building a gas pipeline across Burma and port and naval facilities on the West coast of Burma. The Chinese have a strategic military interest in controlling access to the Bay Bengal. They use their veto power in the UN security council and supply the weapons that the Burmese military needs.

Without the support of China, the military junta could never have survived this long. It is also obvious, that Chinese controlled Singapore (where the Burmese Generals have their bank accounts) and both Koreas are heavily involved in doing "business" with the junta

The US has to prevent Burma from becoming a "Chinese Protectorate" like Tibet or Xinjiang , but it's too late now.

May the Chinese-Burmese learn to eat with chopsticks! I will eat with my fingers or with western cutlery. I am sad for the Burmese who are now slaves.
Zhong Guo Rules!

Yangontha Wrote:
05/11/2009
Don't think Than Shwe is catching two fish ( US & China )at once, for they know that they can not be caught by him.

More likely, he is serving both of them at one time, for he knows that his days are limited and he will use/abuse anyone (not from his family) and give anything (not his own) to US & China, which will only benefit him and his family.




Oo maung gyi Wrote:
05/11/2009
Be careful of the Burmese generals's inner motive. They are good to make relations for money such as bribery or Bonus signatures.

Providing millions of dollars to Than Shwe is not called corruption because he is a head of state in Burma. According to Burmese tradition, offering anything to the head of state does not count as a bribe, it amounts to presents.

These generals are very friendly types so far as money is concerned; therefore it is a good start for the US and Obama administration to make deeper friendly relations with all junta members from the beginning.

KKK Wrote:
05/11/2009
Both are catfish with sharp fins and mild poison. If the SPDC does not know how to catch these catfish, it will be cut by sharp catfish fins. Catfish certaily can puncture the SPDC painfully.

Garrett Wrote:
05/11/2009
More like the SPDC are playing both sides against one another in the same manner they have played the Burmese urban citizens against the ethnic minorities decade after decade.

And how have the urban citizens been rewarded for their apathy? A balance of poverty to keep them down, & the golden opulence of the Buddhist temples to make them forget how poor they are.

China's agenda seems pretty straightforward, but what is in it for the United States? There is nothing that engagement will do to stop China's influence in the region.

Engagement shouldn't be about the West replacing China as the outlet for everything the regime steals or produces with forced labor, nor should it be about Western tourists being treated like kings while millions continue to starve, die of treatable diseases and suffer at the hands of the SPDC.

Engagement should be about saving the Burmese people from the endless nightmare of SPDC-induced poverty, persecution, disease, rape, revenge, extortion and murder.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
05/11/2009
Benedict Rogers' comment, “Their [the Burmese generals’] policy is simply to look out for their own interests – and if by engaging with the US they believe they can promote their own interests, they will do so” and Jeff Kingston's "the Burmese generals are looking to balance their dependence on China by pursuing better ties with the US—but only on their own terms" sum up why Naypyidaw is flirting with Washington DC today.

While Campbell was sent breezing his way into Than Shwe's political maze in Burma, the Chinese were placing their pipelines, not to mention North Koreans whisking WMD into the county.

Than Shwe is playing ball at this juncture just to test the waters: solidarity in the rank and file of NLD, ethnic groups and others before bringing the axe down - 2010 elections - for his eternal rule.

Campbell would be making a mistake bigger than Adam if he lifts the sanctions prior to Than Shwe subjecting his constitution to scrutiny and holding the elections in 2010.





Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

More Articles in This Section


bullet Children’s Rights Celebrated in Naypyidaw

bullet US Calls for Dialogue between Suu Kyi and Junta

bullet UN Passes Resolutions on Burma Human Rights

bullet Myint Swe: The Tatmadaw’s Next Top Dog?

bullet Handcuffed Statue Has the Experts Talking

bullet ‘Burma VJ’ Short-listed for Oscar

bullet Assessing the US-Asean Summit

bullet Coco Islands to Open for Tourism

bullet Global Fund Returns to Burma with Large Grant

bullet Mystery of the Handcuffed Statues


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.