SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




New US Policy to Include Engagement, Sanctions: Clinton


By LALIT K JHA Thursday, September 24, 2009

COMMENTS (7)
RECOMMEND (53)
E-MAIL
PRINT

WASHINGTON — Previewing the new US Burma policy with the 17-member UN Group of Friends on Burma in New York, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the US will pursue a policy of “engagement” and “sanctions” simultaneously.

Clinton said on Wednesday the basic objectives of the US have not changed. She told reporters after the meeting: “Engagement versus sanctions is a false choice, in our opinion. So going forward, we will be employing both of those tools, pursuing our same goals.”

The United States plans to engage diplomatically with military-ruled Burma in addition to pursuing sanctions, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said. (Photo: AFP)

The US policy seeks credible, democratic reform, immediate release of all political prisoners including Aung San Suu Kyi and serious dialogue with opposition and minority ethnic groups, she said.

“To help achieve democratic reform, we will be engaging directly with Burmese authorities. This is a policy that has broad consensus across our government, and there will be more to report as we go forward,” Clinton said. “We believe that sanctions remain important as part of our policy, but by themselves, they have not produced the results that had been hoped for on behalf of the people of Burma.”

Referring to the new policy, Clinton said: “We will be offering more specifics about that. I wanted to preview this policy for our partners in the Friends of Burma group, and also to signal that the United States will be moving in a direction of both engagement and continued sanctions, to be sure that the Burmese leaders—some of whom, as you know, are in our country or about to come to our country—understand where we are in our policy review process.”

Clinton urged the members participating in the meeting to take a measured approach to Burma’s 2010 elections until, “We can assess electoral conditions and determine whether opposition and ethnic groups will participate.” 

She said the Burmese election should not be dismissed at this time. “At the same time, we should continue discussions with the Burmese authorities to emphasize that the international community will only recognize the planned 2010 elections as a positive step to the extent that the Burmese authorities allow full participation by members of Burma’s opposition and ethnic minority groups.”

She said, “Any debate that pits sanctions against engagement creates a false choice.  Going forward, we’ll need to employ both of these tools.

“Lifting sanctions now would send the wrong signal, and we will maintain our existing sanctions until we see concrete progress towards reform. But we will be willing to discuss the easing of sanctions in response to significant actions on the part of Burma’s generals that address the core human rights and democracy issues that are inhibiting Burma’s progress,” she said.

More engagement with the West will encourage new thinking, reform and participation in the work of the international community, she said: “To help Burma achieve genuine democratic reform, we must be willing to engage directly with the Burmese authorities.”

Clinton said the US Burma policy will draw on familiar themes and tools: engagement, appropriate sanctions and humanitarian assistance.

“The aim of the United States is not to impose its will on the Burmese people, but to ensure that they can live in a unified, peaceful, and prosperous country, led by a democratic government that respects the rights of its citizens,” she said.

“Our support for the country’s democratic opposition, including Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy, will not waver,” Clinton said.



COMMENTS (7)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

KKK Wrote:
27/09/2009
Obama's US foreign policy is to make friends with all evil doers and to reduce its super power. Look at Obama's current approval rating. His approval rating is declining so rapidly from 65 percent in January to 50 percent in September. Before the end of this year, his approval rating could be below 50 percent.

Saw Dennis Wrote:
26/09/2009
Sanctions did not work because only a few were strictly enforced. As soon as Obama said he would review US policy on Burma, the SPDC promptly put Daw Suu on trial. Now when the US is sure to raise the level of diplomatic engagement with it, the junta is cooking up plots to get rid of the opposition leaders, because the junta leaders feel that they had been right all along and the change in US policy is an admission of guilt on the part of the US. For getting rid of the opposition leaders, by hook or by crook, it starts cooking up plots, including those calling for transnational crimes. It accuses the ceasefire groups, which turn down its BGF plan for controlling the ethnic armies, of involvement in drug production and trafficking etc. Burma's problem is a highly complicated one and it needs a highly intelligent and well thought out solution. We need people with Einstein-like brains to think out a viable strategy/solution. I wonder if Hillary and her team have that kind of brains.

sonny wynn Wrote:
25/09/2009
This is an major step for the Burmese military regime, but there is a very slim hope for political climate change that favors the Burmese people.

Sure, the generals will take "advantage" of this positive approach put forward by the west/US. Recent government newspapers frankly indicated there are no political prisoners proves that the junta likes to tell big lies.

All Burmese people know that the generals will make sure they legitimize themselves through the 2010 election. It is likely the election law will be announced at the last minute and election will be quickly conductes so that all seats are secured by the generals and their cronies. The 2008 referendum, in which there was massive cheating at all polling stations, has proven that it works well!

Some minority ethnic groups and old/later generations of forgotten historical politicians will be allowed to participate, but their mouths will be shut by tons of 'incentives' they never dreamed of. But their pictures will be widely displayed in the media to please the world. The US and the West will have to eat their own words then.

Moe Aung Wrote:
25/09/2009
Hillary will soon find out how the junta likes the carrot and stick approach. Both seem to want to have it both ways, business as usual.

Tom Tun Wrote:
25/09/2009
First, I think Hillary Clinton is becoming a psychiatric doctor by her way of saying she would change the Burmese Regime's behaviour.

I personally think the sickness of the Burmese regime is out of control. There is only one solution, which is to pick them all up and put them together in a mental hospital.

Second, the US foreign policy in the Obama administration's hands is becomming very strange. Even American analysts don't know what their administration is doing (according to CNN news last night). Eastern Europe is not protected anymore - The plan for a missle defence system for Poland and Checkoslovakia plan was cancelled. Inviting Gaddafi and the Iranian president to US soil to be insulted by those two maniacs? Letting the Burmese generals become VIPs? Whatever next, Mrs. Clinton? If I were in Burma, I would build a good bunker to hide away in.

EKA Wrote:
24/09/2009
Clinton says sanctions have not helped. This is very true because the US and the EU don't control whether sanctions are being followed. That means factories in the US and the EU - indirectly - are able to export parts and weapons systems to the Burma/Myanmar Junta.

The Junta Generals have a long tradition for not caring about what opinion foreign leaders might have about their way of governing the country. Most of their needs are covered by China, Russia, India, Ukraine and other countries. Clinton should be a lot more specific in her objectives before she make moves that could be received and understood as a consolation to the Junta. Her statement seems very naive. The junta don't care about talks - they believe in power!

timothy Wrote:
24/09/2009
The Obama administration policy of sanctions combined with engagement is the right move. The ball is in the Than Shwe`s court now to play the levelled game with Super Power USA. Than Shwe had been annihilating the defenceless opposition of Burma with the full might of weaponary for years now. It was one-sided match with some very ugly stories.

The US involvement is welcome by the Burmese people after "Saving Private Yettaw" misgivings hit the people of Burma in their aspirations for democracy. The US must commit themselves to helping the defenceless unprotected citizens under Than Shwe's army of occupation.





Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

More Articles in This Section


bullet Children’s Rights Celebrated in Naypyidaw

bullet US Calls for Dialogue between Suu Kyi and Junta

bullet UN Passes Resolutions on Burma Human Rights

bullet Myint Swe: The Tatmadaw’s Next Top Dog?

bullet Handcuffed Statue Has the Experts Talking

bullet ‘Burma VJ’ Short-listed for Oscar

bullet Assessing the US-Asean Summit

bullet Coco Islands to Open for Tourism

bullet Global Fund Returns to Burma with Large Grant

bullet Mystery of the Handcuffed Statues


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.