SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




Burmese Opposition Groups Urge Increased Sanctions Pressure


By LALIT K JHA Wednesday, May 6, 2009

E-MAIL
PRINT

WASHINGTON — Two major Burmese opposition groups have urged the US to maintain and stiffen its economic sanctions against the military junta until all political prisoners are released and the regime agrees to a meaningful dialogue with the National League of Democracy (NLD) and ethnic representatives.

The text of the letter, written by the All Burma Monks Alliance (ABMA) and the 88 Generation Students to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was released to the press on Tuesday.

Two leaders of the organizations, Ashin Aww Bar Sa of the ABMA and Tun Myint Aung of the 88 Generation Students, signed the letter from their hiding place. An acquaintance of the two told The Irrawaddy that they believed they should relay their message to Clinton during the US administration’s policy review on Burma, as their arrest could be imminent.

There was no immediate response from the US State Department. State Department Acting Spokesman Robert Wood told reporters last week that the administration is still reviewing its Burma policy. 

“The Secretary hasn’t been happy with the way we have moved forward, the way we have dealt with this in the past,” Wood said. “We’re going to be consulting with our partners in terms of what’s the best way forward in dealing with Burma.”

In their letter, the two Burmese opposition groups urged Clinton to consider stiffening the sanctions with additional measures, including visa bans and other penalties on the regime’s crony businessmen and political surrogates. They also called for a global arms embargo by the UN Security Council if the junta refuses to implement meaningful change.

The letter calls for US diplomatic effort to organize other nations, especially Burma’s neighbors China, India and members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), as well as the EU, to work together to address the situation in Burma with common interest, shared responsibility and unified action. A clear benchmark would be the best way to make sanctions and engagement effective and produce positive results, the opposition leaders argue.

The groups say they support any move for direct engagement between the US and the military junta, but add that any talks should include the junta leader, Snr-Gen Than Shwe.

At last week’s briefing, Acting Spokesman Wood said Secretary of State Clinton remained “very concerned” about the current situation in Burma.

“She has not been happy with policies that we’ve had up until now and, as a result of the administration’s concern about what’s going on in Burma, decided to engage in a very thorough review,” Wood said.

“We’re looking to try to find a way, in working with our other partners in the international community, to address the major concerns that we have, particularly in the humanitarian sphere, with regard to Burma,” he said.

Acknowledging that the sanctions against the military junta have not brought about the desired effect that the US wanted, Wood said: “We’re looking just to see what further we can do.”

The Obama Administration would be working with other partners in the international community to try to figure out a way forward, he said. “We haven’t gotten the changes in terms of behavior that we want to see from the Burmese Government.  So we’ll continue to see what we can do.”



Tom Tun Wrote:
13/05/2009
No educated or wise person wants to shake hands with the devil or sell their soul to Satan. Why are African diamonds called "blood diamonds"? Is it any different when it comes to Burmese economic relations? One example, last year when Cyclone Nagis hit our beloved country, who was it blocking the help from the world and watching coldly while our own people died? If there is a change of economic policy, will the middle class or poor and defenseless class be better off, or will they be enslaved by the rich and powerful? The new constitution doesn't even say anything about how it will help and protect the minimum income of middle class or the poor and defenseless. How could you guys ask for reviewing sanctions? Do you think Hillary Clinton is stupid enough to change the policy? Study more. First things first. Fight the public enemy and everything else will be easy.

Moe Aung Wrote:
11/05/2009
Aung,

First, you know nothing about me or my family.

"As long as people are weak, we'll have rolling coups one after another."

Like in Thailand you mean? It holds the record for coups, and the economy is, shall we say, very wide open.

"We can't just focus too much on one party or one person."

Agreed, but aren't you also rather overawed by the junta's autocratic power thus bending over backwards to appease the one person, namely Than Shwe? Building "an educated middle class" is going to be a long haul in the best of circumstances, and if you think the assured longevity of military misrule will be conducive to its evolution, think again. Then again someone from the educated middle class can hardly be expected to think outside the box - without them as the prime mover.

Aung Wrote:
10/05/2009
Are you fighting for your rights risking your life and your family's, Moe Aung? It's easy to say "More sanctions" when you're conveniently living elsewhere in the world. “Democracy has to be fought for and won." Easier said than done.

What's next? Do you have a plan? Looking back before 1988, it was a closed economy. People were poor and weak too. As long as people are weak, we'll have rolling coups one after another. We should learn from the history.

We're not arguing that the military is not responsible for the poverty. But it's time for practical solutions. Evaluate the power balance realistically. A government by the people for the people. We can't just focus too much on one party or one person.

A healthy democracy needs an educated middle class. Let's build that strong foundation first. Think long-term. Think for the people.

Moe Aung Wrote:
08/05/2009
A.thiha,

"I was born in 1988 and have waited over 20 years for development."

Sorry, much as I can understand your frustration, you are barking up the wrong tree. Do you think we were better off before the sanctions? Indeed, before 1988?

The door is shut to the people by the junta, but half open for themselves. They too want it wide open so they can enrich themselves even more, not because they want to give the rest of us a leg up.

Stop kidding yourselves thinking of the one that got away - you never had a chance, and never will so long as the junta calls all the shots and more importantly fires all the shots. So fight for your rights or compromise and wallow in slavery (lucky to be alive and fed).

Sanctions are measures short of invasion/ regime change so recalcitrant states ease up on the level of repression. The regime wants them lifted not for the people but for themselves. Democracy has to be fought for and won, not handed on a platter through sanctions, definitely not by foreigners.

Kyansitthar Wrote:
08/05/2009
Yes, the people are starving! Who is to blame when your children go hungry?
You can't blame others for that.

Who rules Burma today? Political deadlock, economic woes, and human rights abuses are culminations of Than Shwe's greed for power and riches. His refusal to honor the 1990 election results and hold a time-bound and inclusive dialogue with the people's representatives aggravates matters.

Pressing ahead with the farce 2010 elections for continued military rule won't change the situation of Burma's citizenry for the better for either.

Than Shwe's disregard for people is evidenced in Nargis victims still going hungry and homeless today, not to mention millions on the Burma-Thailand border hungry and waiting help from alien lands.

Don't blame sanctions. Than Shwe is the root cause of sanctions on Burma today.

nono Wrote:
08/05/2009
Asking for the opposition groups or leaders to stop asking for sanctions is good but I think it is better to ask Than Shwe why these people are asking for sanctions. He knows the answer. Than Shwe and his leaders have said that Burma is a very rich country and people in Burma are very rich.

A.K.Win Wrote:
08/05/2009
Some of the opposition leaders seem to put their personal vengeance above the nation's interest. I can feel the pain of their suffering but they should not create further suffering for people inside the country. The people are in the cross hairs between government bullets and their powerful words. Beside, if there are going to be any free elections in future, I will not vote for anybody cannot stand on their own feet. Thakin Aung San got us independent without any help from any nations. Those opposition leaders, on the other hand, are incapable of producing their own policy or political will.

Ava Wrote:
08/05/2009
What a complex dilemma, clouded by selective moralizing, hypocrisy and black-or-white thinking! I used to be a sanctions supporter (disinvestment worked in South Africa to end apartheid), but I have completely changed position after talking to Burmese people. Sanctions are unlikely to work in Burma as we live in an interconnected society; also sanctions should be by definition a relatively short term affair to be successful (Cuba/Iran? not working!). Aren't sanctions by US/EU that don't bring along China, Russia, India, Thailand and Korea as Burma's biggest trading partners, a waste of effort? Clearly the US/EU have their agenda (more investment beyond Unocal/Total), so we need to be realistic! While visa bans, the freezing of assets of key SPDC people and insurance boycotts (Lloyds) seem pretty clever to me, I think we need a carrot and stick approach, which simply means we need to engage as well. I recommend reading Mueller & Mueller's paper on "Sanctions of Mass Destruction."

Mg khin Wrote:
07/05/2009
Dear opposition leaders, please stop asking for sanctions. It is not working, you know well. And not only that this is the reason why the present leaders are holding power and China is supporting them. And this is the reason why you are accused of being agents of Western powers. There will be other ways of starting freedom and democracy in the given situation. Be more creative and realistic.

A voice from people Wrote:
07/05/2009

What is the so-called purpose of sanctions? For the people, claim those opposition groups.

How can people get money to feed themselves inside the country? Money by working.
If there is a scarcity of jobs inside countries which is created by sanctions, what do sanctions really do?

Think of legitimate and pragmatic ways, dear opposition groups. Don't echo what others did by not critically pondering.


A.thiha Wrote:
07/05/2009
I have some questions:

1. Which countries got democracy through sanctions?

2. Is there any country that improved democracy because of sanctions?

3. Have you ever thought of the people who lost their jobs due to sanctions?

4. Can you take responsibility for those who lost their jobs due to the closure of factories?

I respect your work in the struggle for democracy, but no more sanctions. You have positions and power—please work for the people not for party and organizations.

I was born in 1988 and have waited over 20 years for development. Our generation needs development of the country. Please think of future generations and people.

plan B Wrote:
07/05/2009
When will these people realize that historically the Burmese authorities disdain interference from without?
Hasn't the call for sanctions by Aung San Suu Kyi and her subsequent treatment proved enough?
We need breakthrough people. As of now, nobody is listening.
The junta is ploughing ahead with the RMTD.
The opposition is still hanging on to sanctions which is the only way to validate themselves.
Nobody, meanwhile, is talking about ways to bring help to the suffering masses by compromising.


Aung Wrote:
07/05/2009
Just explain how sanctions would finally lead to democracy! It's outrageous.

We need to come up with realistic steps towards freedom. We need to think of what we're going to do after getting democracy.

Sanctions just make people poorer. Do you want people to become so poor that they don't care if they live any more, that they go out and face the guns pointing at them?

We're talking about 50 million people held hostage.

If we lose another 20 years, you're all responsible! Those who oppose sanctions should speak up, too. I know you are out there!





Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

More Articles in This Section


bullet Authorities Threaten Violence at Rangoon Strike

bullet End of February Deadline for BGF

bullet Eggs Withdrawn at Markets after Flu Outbreak

bullet Returning Karen Refugees Fear Landmines

bullet Burmese Navy Participates in Asia-Pacific War Games

bullet Celebrating Shan National Day

bullet Burmese Rock Star-Journalist Wins International Award

bullet International Lawyers Question Thailand's Security Law

bullet Karen Refugees Warned Not To Talk

bullet Thai-Burmese Border Camps Braced for New Refugee Flow


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.