BURMA

US Eases Sanctions on Burma, Appoints Ambassador

Print This Post

The newly appointed US ambassador to Burma, Derek Mitchell, speaks to Aung San Suu Kyi at her home in Rangoon in March while he served as US special envoy to Myanmar. (PHOTO: Reuters)

WASHINGTON—President Barack Obama on Thursday declared a new chapter in US relations with Burma, easing an investment ban and naming the first US ambassador to the former pariah state in 22 years to reward it for democratic reforms.

Both Republican and Democrat senators welcomed the administration’s move, but human rights activists said it was premature to reward a government that remains dominated by its military and still holds hundreds of political prisoners.

Burma opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi’s election to parliament last month has prompted Western governments to roll back years of hard-hitting restrictions against the Asian nation, which is emerging from decades of authoritarian rule and diplomatic isolation.

After meeting Burma’s foreign minister, Wunna Maung Lwin, US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said that the US was suspending sanctions on export of American financial services and investment across all sectors of the Burma economy—including in the resource-rich country’s lucrative oil, gas and mining sectors. She described it as the most significant action Washington has taken so far to reward Burma for its reforms.

“Today we say to American businesses, Invest in Burma and do it responsibly,” she told a joint news conference after talks with the foreign minister at the State Department. She said US companies would be expected to conduct due diligence to avoid any problems, including human rights abuses.

Despite the easing of restrictions, US companies would still be barred from doing business with firms associated with the country’s powerful military. The White House also announced it was keeping its framework of hard-hitting sanctions in place for now, saying Burma’s democratic reforms are still “nascent.”

Clinton described that as an “insurance policy.”

“The United States remains concerned about Burma’s closed political system, its treatment of minorities and detention of political prisoners, and its relationship with North Korea,” Obama said in a statement.

Voicing similar reservations, but crediting Burma’s reforms, influential lawmakers supported the administration’s announcements, underscoring that policy toward Burma is one in which the two parties can see eye to eye.

Republicans John McCain and Mitch McConnell said in a statement that the measures struck “an appropriate balance” between encouraging reform and maintaining leverage to press Burma to make more progress. Democrat John Kerry called it a “logical step forward.” Fellow Democrat Jim Webb urged the administration to go further and lift economic sanctions entirely. The US retains sanctions on trade and against lending to Burma by institutions like the World Bank.

One dissenting voice was Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Republican chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who said “serious questions remain about Burma’s journey toward democracy.”

The senators welcomed the nomination of Derek Mitchell, the current special envoy to Burma who will become the first US ambassador to be based in the country since 1990. Clinton urged his quick confirmation by the Senate. The US is currently represented by a lower-level diplomat.

Burma will also send a full ambassador to Washington, a post to be taken by its current permanent representative to the United Nations in New York, Than Swe.

Human rights groups and exiled Burma activists were strongly critical of easing economic controls.

The US Coalition for Burma said the Obama administration was prematurely rewarding Burma while its military was escalating violence against the Kachin ethnic minority in the north of the country. The fighting over the past year has displaced tens of thousands of villagers.

“It ignores the reality of the situation on the ground, including ongoing atrocities,” said Tom Andrews of the group United to End Genocide. “This is a dangerous decision that is likely to further exacerbate human rights abuses and has left the US government without any leverage in future.”

Clinton voiced concern over the continued detention of political prisoners. Western governments say hundreds of such detainees are still held despite a series of amnesties granted by Burma’s President Thein Sein over the past year.

The Burma minister conceded there were some “so-called political prisoners” who have committed criminal offenses, such as murder, rape or are connected to terrorism. He said Thein Sein will grant further amnesties “when appropriate.”

The US investment ban has been in place since 1997. US businesses have been pushing the administration to follow the example of the European Union, which recently suspended all its economic sanctions, including on trade — although like the US, it retains an arms embargo. American businesses could yet be constrained in their involvement in the oil, gas, mining and timber industries because of military involvement in those sectors.

Suu Kyi, who spent 15 of the previous 22 years under house arrest before her release in late 2010, this week gave cautious backing to the suspension of economic sanctions but warned against undue optimism about Burma and said the reforms toward democracy—after five decades of military dominance—were still reversible.

Human Rights Watch expressed disappointment that standards of corporate responsibility that the US says will ensure transparency and oversight in American business dealings in Burma would not be legally binding.

“Human rights problems in Burma are way too serious for self-regulation,” said John Sifton, the group’s Asia advocacy director. “Preventing corporations from fueling human rights abuses, or strengthening the military regime, is a task for government.”


LATEST VIDEO

>

2 Responses to US Eases Sanctions on Burma, Appoints Ambassador

  1. George Than Setkyar Heine

    Finally, the mighty US has CAVED in to lowly Thein Sein military backed governing body at Naypyidaw.
    I didn’t RECKON for a moment that US could be WELL DUPED in this way.
    What about ALL the BLOOD SPILLED and SACRIFICES made by the PEOPLE of BURMA and Daw Suu as well since day one since 1988 until today?
    Maybe the US has JUMPED the GUN like the EU did for a PIECE of the PIE (Burma’s vast natural resources and strategic position).
    Of course, the US needs to CONTAIN the Chinese communists and DEPRIVED the Chinese reds of Burma’s STRATEGIC LOCATION most importantly before CONFRONTING the Chinese in the SOUTH CHINA SEA I understand.
    However the Burmese opposition alliances around the world and inside Burma are FRUSTRATED and ANGRY over this PREMATURE and UNTIMELY US move no doubt.
    And they certainly are AWARE of the FACT that the US, EU and the West as well are BANKRUPT and BROKE today as well.
    However, THROWING Burma and the people led by Daw Suu to the WOLVES at Naypyidaw at this time and juncture on the part of the US led West after all these past decades and GETTING HOODWINKED – letting only a paltry 43 members of NLD into Thein Sein’s 440 seat parliament and conditional (SECTION 401)release of some high profile political prisoners while hundreds still remained in custody – by the China backed lot at the Naypyidaw CLEARLY EVIDENCED their DESPERATION, LACK of PRINCIPLE and COMPREHENSIVE POLICY as well on Burma until today.
    The US led West is BLIND to the FACT Than Shwe’s lackey Thein Sein is PLAYING POSSUM only and UNDER ORDERS to GET the MOST out of the PICTURE and SITUATION prevailing at the moment.
    The communists in Beijing are STILL PULLING STRINGS on Than Shwe and his PUPPETS wearing military uniforms and civilian attires at Naypyidaw lest Obama and Clinton forget.
    Evidence in point and fact: KIA/Kachins are STILL UNDER ATTACK until today by Chinese picked Min Aung Hlaing’s forces despite TWICE ORDERED by Thein Sein to HALT the HOSTILITIES in Kachin land.
    Note: The Chinese communists have the DEADLINE (2013) to CONCLUDE their projects (Myitsone Dam and other interests in Burma).
    And Than Shwe was given 30 Billion Yuan in 2009 for that matter.
    Hence, Thein Sein is DRAGGING HIS FEET/STALLING the GAME by forming a PEACE COMMISSION/COMMISSION headed by himself promising to CONCLUDE PEACE in Burma by 2015.
    Simply WITHDRAWING ALL BURMESE FORCES OUT OF KACHIN STATE IS ALL THAT IT TAKES TO BRING PEACE in Kachin State and ALL ETHNIC LANDS as well BASICALLY.
    CHINA WANTS Kachin State before Daw Suu takes the HELM of Burma in 2015 and inevitably as well, that’s the FACT.
    And ANYTHING COULD HAPPEN between NOW and 2015, MOST LIKELY and POSSIBLY as well an U TURN on the part of Than Shwe’s lackey Thein Sein KNOWING Daw Suu would SWARM his parliament as evidenced by the results of the last April Fool’s Day elections.
    In fact this could HAPPEN – U TURN – SOONER by LIFTING the SANCTIONS today any bets?
    Daw Suu has EXPRESSED/GIVEN HER RELEVANT and TRUE APPREHENSIONS/FEARS over the fact and matter lately as well.
    ABANDONING BURMA and Daw Suu led people still FIGHTING and SACRIFICING for their DEMOCRACY, FREEDOM and HUMAN RIGHTS with a VIEW to MAKE A QUICK BUCK or TWO on the part of the US led West is NOT FAIR much less WARRANTED and UNCALLED FOR least of all at this time and juncture specifically I say.
    LEOPARDS DON’T CHANGE their SPOTS!
    DICTATORS NEVER GIVE UP their POWER, PROSPERITY and POSTERITY VOLUNTARILY!
    And THIS IS A FACT and THE BOTTOM LINE for BURMA today folks!

  2. Newly appointed US ambassador to Burma, Derek Mitchell,will watch the effects of sanctions carefully.After all it is now crystal clear that USA’s sanctions policy has forced ALL the generals to change their behaviour unimaginable years ago.