NEWS ANALYSIS

Muted Coverage of Burmese Vote Shows Chinese Unease

Print This Post

Burmese tea house in Jiegao, Yunnan Province, where Sunday's by-elections have been a hot topic despite being largely ignored by state Chinese media. (Photo: Irrawaddy)

While Chinese checkpoints deal with Wednesday’s peak border-traffic as families cross to visit ancestral graves in China for the annual Qingming Festival, Burma’s biggest neighbor and largest trading partner is coming to terms with Aung San Suu Kyi’s victory in Sunday’s by-elections.

Chinese national state media has remained largely tight-lipped on the historic poll, while the campaign and elections have been hot topics for liberal media outlets and informal micro-blogs.

China Central Television (CCTV) news, which is broadcast on national and regional channels all over the Asian superpower, reported the results of the by-elections as they were announced by Burmese state media MRTV.

This followed a report by Xinhua Chinese state news agency about the weekend ballot that did not elaborate on any of the details or background. Yet, on March 31, CCTV did broadcast a longer report from its correspondent Wang Yuezhou regarding Burmese media coverage during the by-elections.

Preceding last Sunday’s historic vote, reporters from several major liberal Chinese news outlets—such as Caixin, Dongfang Daily, Southern People, Southern Metropolis Daily and Asia Weekly—joined the torrential flood of foreign journalists traveling to Burma to cover Suu Kyi’s election campaign.

“With such changes happening inside Burma, China’s biggest effort was to preserve a position of non-interference,” said Zhao Gancheng, director of the South Asia Center at the Shanghai Institute of International Studies and a frequent commentator on Burmese issues, in an interview with Shenzhen Television on Sunday.

“At the same time, we hope that Burma could preserve its domestic stability,” Zhao added. “It think that the reconciliation in Burma does not harm Chinese interests. China welcomes that Burma can rid itself of international sanctions.

“We have to watch vigilantly. If the United States and other Western countries can use these events to turn Burma into a country, say, serving American geopolitical strategic interests, this will have a negative effect on Chinese relations with Burma.”

Hu Xijin, the influential editor-in-chief of the nationalist daily Global Times, congratulated Burma “on its way toward democracy, gradually leaving behind its past poverty and military rule,” in a tweet on his Sina Weibo micro-blog on Sunday, which has more than 1.9 million followers.

“Some people by praising Burma satirize China, that is ridiculous,” Hu wrote. “Equating democracy with elections is but dogmatic learning by rote. To understand the quality of democracy in a country, it is critical to look at the distance between the people’s will and government policies in that country, and how smoothly these policies can be implemented.”

“It is too early to make Burma an example for China,” Hu concluded in the message, which has been re-tweeted more than 950 times.

“Aung San Suu Kyi won the Burmese elections! Ninty-nine percent voted for her. The other year, Saddam Hussein also got 99 percent,” internet commentator Wang Guangxiong, who works for the online portal Sohu and has 1.1 million followers on his micro-blog, wrote on Monday.

“In my opinion, the first [victory] is because of the power of values, the latter is because of the power of the gun. At last, conscience prevails over weapons.”

Chinese democracy activist Ran Yunfei tweeted about the cheerful reactions at his home when he shared the news of Suu Kyi’s victory. “My daughter screamed: ‘Really! My god!’ My wife said from downstairs: ‘Congratulations to them.’ I just said one sentence: ‘What is there that can’t be done.’”

Ran is a signatory of Nobel Peace Price laureate Liu Xiaobo’s Charter 08—calling for democracy in China—who currently works at a government-run publication in Chengdu in the central Chinese province of Sichuan.

Chinese media said that three observers were sent to monitor the Burmese by-elections. According to a source within the Chinese Embassy in Rangoon, these were Ambassador Li Junhua and two other resident diplomats.

One reporter for Time Magazine said she met one of the Chinese diplomats, surnamed Xiong, at a polling station in Kawhmu Township where Suu Kyi won her seat. “So, China is interested in democracy?” she joked. The diplomat simply smiled and walked away.


LATEST VIDEO

>

6 Responses to Muted Coverage of Burmese Vote Shows Chinese Unease

  1. THE CHINESE SHOULD COMPARE AUNG SAN SUU KYI’S 99% VICTORY WITH THAT OF SADDAM HUSSAIN. THE VICTOY OF MILITARY BACKED PARTY USDP IN 2010 IS BETTER COMPARISON WITH SADDAM OR FORMER SOVIET LEADERS. HOWEVER, CHINA’S SYSTEM OF ELECTING LEADERS ARE EVEN WORSE BECAUSE ANY KIND OF ELECTION IS NON-EXISTENT IN CHINA.

  2. Chinese Communist Party is losing a friend. Communism has no place in Burma.

  3. “So, China is interested in democracy?” she joked. The diplomat simply smiled and walked away.

    He smiled. Busted!

  4. Zhao Gancheng and Hu Xijin’s comments are positive and to be expected. It’s always unwise and detrimental to our national interest to be even perceived as belonging to one camp or the other. Remember we used to be co-founders of the non-aligned movement during the Cold War era.

    Wang Guangxiong’s sentiments are understandable and shared by most, but the jury is still out as to the real agenda behind this extraordinary new found permissiveness and future plans on the part of the regime. Remember they are playing a long game. ASSK/NLD won a battle but not the war.

  5. China is NOT a communist country. It is a capitalist or fascist country ruled by a party that calls itself the CCP. I realise many people will still call it a communist country merely because it is ruled by the CCP, but it is not ‘communist’ by fair measure in spite of many purporting that it is so.

    The basic to a communist country is that the people (through the state) must own the means of production. This is not so any longer. So the CCP is evolving. Much of the country is in private hands. They should simply brave up and call themselves something like Chinese Party or Chinese Communitarian Party or Socialist Party of China, rather than try to pretend and pretend they are Communists ruling a communist country. Just because you are a one-party state, having some state-owned companies and banks and a non-free floating currency, does not make it commmunist. But most Americans are too dumb to realise this and are happy to call it communist. Yet American businesses continue to invest heavily in China because the real economics on the ground in China shows that it is far from communist.

    As for Myanmar, China is not interested in turning it communist. Why would it, when China is not even communist itself?

    Yes, China needs friends but most to the world recognises China (PRC) and not Taiwan (ROC). So PRC has little to worry even if the West want to invest in Myanmar.

    It will be win-win if more investment comes into Myanmar: the rulers, the people, the West and China all win with more investment coming in, and the’economic pie will grow bigger for all. If only this was the case for more countries, but without genuine democracy, businesses in the west and most developed countries will be very reluctant to invest, so leaving investment to the PRC (this is the mase in many less than democratic countries).

    One day China may evolve its political system. They should start in places like Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Macau, Tibet, Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia. But the rest of China should reform rather than risk mass protests that emd up neomh put down by force cycle after cycle.

  6. Show me which developing country is achieving democracy and prosperity in the same time. Philippines ??